What Verdica's 850 score means for OUR LADY OF THE VALLEY
OUR LADY OF THE VALLEY has achieved a composite Verdica score of 850 out of 850, placing it in the "excellent" performance band (800–850). This score reflects that the provider has demonstrated strong performance across all three regulatory dimensions tracked by Verdica: inspection and deficiencies, quality measures, and enforcement history.
A score of 850 indicates that available CMS data shows no significant gaps in compliance or quality reporting. For a healthcare provider, this means regulators have not identified material deficiencies during inspections, reported quality measures are at or near benchmarks, and there is no notable enforcement action on record. Readers should interpret this as a signal that the provider meets or exceeds baseline regulatory standards. However, it is important to note that Verdica scores reflect publicly available regulatory data; they do not constitute medical advice, and an excellent score does not guarantee individual patient outcomes or specific service quality beyond what regulators measure.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies: 850 This sub-score evaluates findings from state and federal inspections, typically conducted under Medicare/Medicaid oversight. A perfect score here means inspectors have not documented deficiencies—violations of licensing, safety, staffing, or operational standards—or any deficiencies identified were corrected and closed. In the healthcare industry, deficiency findings range from administrative minor issues to serious threats to resident/patient safety. An 850 in this dimension signals that OUR LADY OF THE VALLEY has passed regulatory scrutiny without flagged violations in the inspectors' reports.
Quality Measures: 850 CMS publishes standardized quality metrics for healthcare facilities, such as infection rates, readmission rates, staffing ratios, and clinical outcome indicators. A perfect score in this dimension means the facility's reported metrics are in line with or exceed the performance expected by regulators. High scores here typically correlate with consistent adherence to clinical protocols and safe operational practices, though these measures do not substitute for detailed clinical audits.
Enforcement History: 850 This sub-score tracks formal regulatory actions—citations, fines, license restrictions, or legal enforcement outcomes. A perfect score indicates no recorded enforcement actions. In healthcare, enforcement typically follows serious or unresolved violations. An 850 here means OUR LADY OF THE VALLEY does not carry an active or recent enforcement record in the data sources Verdica monitors.
What regulators in VA track for healthcare providers
Virginia's healthcare providers are subject to oversight by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Virginia Department of Health, depending on facility type and licensure. CMS inspections measure compliance with Conditions of Participation (CoPs) or Conditions for Coverage—regulatory standards covering patient safety, infection control, staffing qualifications, emergency preparedness, and medical record documentation.
Quality measures tracked publicly include metrics such as hospital-acquired infection rates, 30-day readmission rates, mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and staffing ratios. These measures are reported to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and published for public transparency.
Deficiencies are categorized by severity: minor administrative oversights may have little regulatory weight, while serious deficiencies—such as failures in infection prevention, unsafe staffing levels, or medication errors—can trigger corrective action plans or, in extreme cases, loss of Medicare/Medicaid certification. Enforcement actions escalate when providers fail to remedy cited deficiencies within required timeframes.
Bottom line
OUR LADY OF THE VALLEY's perfect 850 score places it among providers with no flagged deficiencies, strong quality measure performance, and clean enforcement records in publicly available CMS data. Someone considering this provider should view the score as a positive regulatory signal, but should independently verify that the specific services needed are available and appropriate for their use case, and may wish to cross-check patient satisfaction or accreditation status through other sources.