What Verdica's 850 score means for PEORIA POST ACUTE AND REHABILITATION
Peoria Post Acute and Rehabilitation has achieved a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing it in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects performance across three regulatory dimensions tracked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): inspection and deficiency findings, quality measures, and enforcement history. A perfect score in all three areas indicates that the facility has demonstrated compliance with federal standards across inspections, quality reporting, and regulatory enforcement records.
Readers should understand that this score is built on objective, publicly reported data rather than subjective opinion. The score does not assess patient satisfaction directly—no independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this facility. However, the underlying data sources (CMS inspection results and quality measures) are the primary mechanisms regulators use to monitor post-acute care provider safety and performance. An 850 score signals that this facility has not accumulated deficiency citations, meets or exceeds national quality benchmarks, and has no active enforcement actions on record.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies (850/850): This sub-score reflects findings from CMS or state survey agency inspections. Regulators conduct unannounced surveys to verify compliance with Conditions of Participation—standards covering staffing, infection control, medication management, care planning, and resident rights. A perfect score in this dimension means the facility either has no cited deficiencies or has resolved all previously identified deficiencies. Low scores in this category typically indicate systemic compliance gaps or repeat violations.
Quality Measures (850/850): CMS publishes standardized quality metrics for post-acute facilities, including measures related to hospital readmissions, infections, functional outcomes, and safe medication use. This sub-score reflects how the facility's reported metrics compare to national benchmarks. A maximum score indicates performance at or above expected thresholds across these measures. Facilities with lower scores in this dimension typically show higher rates of adverse events or complications relative to peers.
Enforcement History (850/850): This sub-score tracks whether regulators have imposed sanctions, fines, or corrective action plans on the facility. Post-acute providers with clean enforcement records receive maximum scores; those with civil monetary penalties, facility closures, or ongoing corrective action plans receive lower scores. An 850 in this dimension means no active enforcement actions are documented in CMS records.
What regulators in AZ track for healthcare providers
In Arizona, as in all states, CMS-certified post-acute rehabilitation facilities are subject to periodic survey and inspection. Surveyors examine compliance with roughly 100 Conditions of Participation, organized into domains including administration, quality of care, infection prevention, medication management, and resident rights. Deficiencies are cited at levels of severity: minor findings have limited impact on resident welfare, while "immediate jeopardy" findings suggest serious risk of harm.
Facilities are also required to submit standardized quality data to the CMS Nursing Home Compare database (and similar repositories for other post-acute settings). These measures track outcomes such as skilled nursing readmissions, urinary tract infections, pressure injuries, and hospital transfers. States may add additional oversight through licensure requirements, but federal CMS standards form the primary compliance baseline.
Enforcement actions—ranging from civil monetary penalties to termination of Medicare participation—occur when serious deficiencies are unresolved or when patterns of non-compliance emerge. These actions are publicly reported and carry significant operational and financial consequences.
Bottom line
Peoria Post Acute and Rehabilitation's perfect 850 score indicates strong alignment with federal compliance standards across inspections, quality reporting, and enforcement records. However, prospective patients, families, or business partners should supplement this score by reviewing current staffing ratios, visiting the facility, and consulting any available patient feedback or state-specific licensing records not reflected in the Verdica composite.