What Verdica's 850 score means for ROSELAWN MANOR
ROSELAWN MANOR has earned a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing it in Verdica's excellent band (800–850). This score reflects performance across three regulatory dimensions: inspection and deficiencies, quality measures, and enforcement history. A perfect composite score indicates that the facility has met or exceeded benchmarks in all three areas as measured by CMS data and inspection results.
Readers should interpret this score as evidence that ROSELAWN MANOR has demonstrated compliance with federal healthcare regulations and quality standards as currently documented. The facility has no indexed independent customer reviews on Verdica, so this analysis is based entirely on regulatory and quality data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. For someone evaluating this provider, an 850 score suggests low regulatory risk based on available inspection and performance records.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies (850/850): This sub-score measures compliance findings from state and federal inspections. A score of 850 indicates that ROSELAWN MANOR has had no substantive deficiencies cited during recent inspection cycles, or deficiencies that were documented were minor and promptly corrected. In the nursing home and long-term care industry, inspectors assess factors like infection control, medication management, resident rights, staffing adequacy, and facility maintenance. A perfect score in this dimension reflects a clean or near-clean inspection record.
Quality Measures (850/850): This sub-score is based on CMS-tracked quality indicators such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure injuries, medication errors, and resident satisfaction metrics where applicable. A maximum score here means ROSELAWN MANOR's reported quality outcomes are in line with or exceed national benchmarks. Healthcare facilities with strong quality measure scores typically demonstrate lower rates of adverse events and better operational consistency.
Enforcement History (850/850): This sub-score evaluates the absence or minimal presence of penalties, citations, or enforcement actions from CMS or state regulators. A perfect score means no recent fines, corrective action plans, loss of licensing, or other punitive regulatory actions are recorded in the data Verdica indexes.
What regulators in OH track for healthcare providers
Ohio healthcare providers are regulated by CMS (at the federal level for Medicare/Medicaid participation) and by the Ohio Department of Health. For facilities like ROSELAWN MANOR, regulators monitor several key compliance areas:
Inspection and deficiency citations are generated during unannounced or scheduled surveys. Inspectors document violations ranging from minor administrative issues to serious systemic failures. These are classified by severity level, and repeated or unresolved deficiencies can trigger escalated enforcement.
Quality measures tracked by CMS include staffing ratios, resident health outcomes (pressure injuries, falls, infections), medication administration accuracy, and care plan compliance. Facilities self-report many measures, and CMS validates them through inspection and claims data review.
Enforcement actions in Ohio can include financial penalties, mandatory corrective action plans, temporary management takeover, license suspension, or decertification from Medicare/Medicaid. These actions are public record and appear in regulatory databases.
Scores move based on the frequency, severity, and recency of deficiencies; the trajectory of quality measure performance; and the presence or absence of enforcement activity. A facility with zero deficiencies and strong quality outcomes typically earns the highest scores.
Bottom line
ROSELAWN MANOR's perfect 850 score indicates strong regulatory compliance and quality performance based on available CMS data and inspection records. Before engaging with this provider, you should verify current licensing status independently, confirm that services align with your specific needs, and consider requesting references or speaking with current clients—metrics alone do not capture service quality, staff experience, or operational fit.