What Verdica's 850 score means for SAMUEL MAHELONA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
SAMUEL MAHELONA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL has achieved a composite compliance score of 850 out of 850, placing it in the "excellent" band (800–850). This top-tier score reflects consistent, measurable adherence to federal quality and inspection standards across all tracked dimensions. For a business owner, purchaser, or patient evaluating this provider, an 850 score signals that the entity has demonstrated no material gaps in the three core areas Verdica monitors: inspection and deficiency records, quality measure performance, and enforcement history.
It is important to note that Verdica's score is built on regulatory data—primarily CMS inspection results and quality metrics—rather than patient satisfaction or volume. A reader should understand this score as a compliance-focused signal, not a substitute for other due diligence. The 850 indicates that regulators have found no significant structural, operational, or safety deficiencies, and that the hospital's reported quality performance meets or exceeds baseline standards.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies: 850
This sub-score reflects the outcome of state and federal surveys conducted under CMS authority. Inspectors assess facilities against conditions of participation (CoPs)—regulatory requirements covering staffing, equipment, infection control, medication management, and patient safety protocols. A score of 850 in this dimension indicates that recent inspection cycles have not yielded substantive deficiencies. Minor, self-corrected issues may be recorded but do not significantly impact the score; material or repeat violations drop this metric sharply.
Quality Measures: 850
This sub-score aggregates CMS-reported quality performance metrics, which typically include readmission rates, mortality rates, healthcare-associated infection rates, timeliness of care interventions, and patient safety indicators. Hospitals report these metrics publicly; CMS compares them to national and state benchmarks. A perfect score here means reported performance is aligned with or exceeds expected standards across tracked measures. Note that low patient volume in some measures can create statistical noise; the score reflects what CMS has published, not absolute clinical outcomes.
Enforcement History: 850
This sub-score tracks formal regulatory actions—Civil Monetary Penalties (CMPs), Conditions of Participation revocations, directed plans of correction, and settlement agreements. A score of 850 indicates no recent or ongoing enforcement activity on record. A provider with this score has not faced documented federal sanctions in the tracked timeframe.
What regulators in HI track for healthcare providers
CMS and Hawaii's Department of Health conduct periodic inspections of licensed hospitals to verify compliance with Conditions of Participation. These inspections focus on governance and administration, medical staff credentialing, nursing staffing levels, medical record documentation, laboratory and diagnostic services, infection prevention and control, medication management, emergency preparedness, and patient rights protections.
Deficiencies are categorized by severity. Isolated lapses in documentation or minor process gaps may trigger Standard deficiencies; systemic failures or patient safety risks elevate them to Condition-level deficiencies, which can trigger corrective action or enforcement. CMS also monitors quality measures submitted by hospitals—data on patient outcomes, readmission rates, mortality, infection rates, and care timeliness. These are publicly reported and benchmarked nationally. Enforcement actions, when triggered, typically follow unresolved deficiencies or repeated non-compliance and may include financial penalties or, rarely, loss of Medicare participation.
Bottom line
An 850/850 score places SAMUEL MAHELONA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL in the highest compliance category based on available regulatory data. For stakeholders evaluating the provider, this suggests strong regulatory standing; however, compliance scores should be cross-checked against other factors such as service lines, capacity, financial stability, and accreditation status before making final decisions. This score does not address patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes beyond reported metrics, or operational efficiency.