What Verdica's 850 score means for THE PALMETTO SURGERY CENTER
THE PALMETTO SURGERY CENTER has earned a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing it in Verdica's highest performance band (800–850 range), which reflects excellent compliance and quality standing. This score aggregates three independent regulatory dimensions: inspection and deficiency records, quality measures reported to CMS, and enforcement history. A perfect score of 850 indicates that the facility has not accumulated deficiencies or enforcement actions that would reduce its standing, and that its reported quality metrics meet or exceed benchmarks tracked by federal oversight bodies.
Readers should interpret this as a signal that THE PALMETTO SURGERY CENTER has met baseline regulatory requirements without notable gaps flagged during inspections. However, it is important to note that Verdica's scoring reflects absence of documented problems rather than excellence in absolute terms—a score of 850 means the facility has no indexed deficiencies, not necessarily that it outperforms peers. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this provider, so the score reflects only regulatory and CMS data, not patient experience feedback.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies (850/850): This sub-score reflects findings from state and federal surveys of the facility's compliance with operational, staffing, safety, and record-keeping standards. An 850 indicates that inspectors have not documented violations or deficiencies serious enough to be recorded in the CMS Enforcement and Compliance History Information (ECHI) system. In the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) context, inspectors evaluate infection control, anesthesia safety, surgical protocols, staff credentialing, and equipment maintenance. A perfect sub-score means no cited gaps in these areas have been indexed.
Quality Measures (850/850): CMS publishes quality metrics for ASCs covering dimensions such as patient safety indicators, appropriate use of procedures, and complication rates where data is available. An 850 on this dimension means the facility's reported quality data does not show performance gaps relative to available benchmarks. This reflects compliance with CMS Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) requirements but does not indicate whether the facility voluntarily reports expanded quality data beyond the minimum.
Enforcement History (850/850): This sub-score captures civil monetary penalties, revocation actions, exclusions from Medicare/Medicaid, or other formal enforcement actions taken by CMS or state regulators. An 850 indicates no such actions are recorded against the entity. For an ASC, enforcement typically results from serious deficiencies, repeat violations, or patient safety incidents.
What regulators in FL track for healthcare providers
Florida's Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) and CMS jointly oversee ASCs through the Conditions for Coverage (CfC) framework. Inspectors evaluate compliance with federal Conditions for Coverage, which include governance, staffing qualifications, patient rights, infection control, anesthesia safety, surgical services, and medical records. Deficiencies are classified by severity: minor issues may not reduce a score, while condition-level deficiencies (failures to meet CfC) trigger score reductions and potential enforcement action.
CMS quality measures tracked for ASCs include surgical site infection rates, appropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics, patient safety indicators, and complications where data is available. States also track licensing compliance, including whether the facility maintains required state permits and whether key staff hold valid credentials.
Enforcement actions—civil monetary penalties, conditional participation status, or termination from Medicare—result from serious or repeat deficiencies, allegations of patient harm, or fraud. These actions are publicly reported in ECHI.
Bottom line
THE PALMETTO SURGERY CENTER's score of 850/850 indicates it has no indexed regulatory deficiencies, quality measure gaps, or enforcement actions on record with CMS and state regulators. This is a strong baseline signal for prospective patients or referring physicians. However, anyone considering this facility should also request direct references from current surgical teams, verify current state licensure independently, and review recent patient feedback beyond Verdica's indexed data.