What Verdica's 850 score means for WASHINGTON CENTER
WASHINGTON CENTER has achieved a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing it in Verdica's highest performance band (800–850). This score reflects excellent performance across all three measured dimensions of healthcare provider compliance and quality: inspection and deficiency history, quality measure outcomes, and enforcement history.
A score in this band indicates that a provider has demonstrated consistent adherence to regulatory standards, maintained strong quality performance metrics, and avoided significant enforcement actions. For a business owner, consumer, or referral partner evaluating this provider, an 850 score suggests low compliance risk based on the available regulatory data. However, it's important to note that Verdica's scoring is limited to CMS regulatory sources; independent patient reviews have not yet been indexed for this entity, so this assessment reflects regulatory compliance only, not patient experience or satisfaction data.
Readers should interpret this score as a strong regulatory foundation but should supplement it with other due diligence appropriate to their relationship with the provider—such as direct references, operational audits, or patient feedback—depending on their specific needs.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies (850/850): This sub-score reflects the provider's performance during state and federal inspections, as well as any documented deficiencies identified by CMS surveyors. A perfect score in this dimension indicates that the facility has either passed recent inspections without significant findings, or has successfully remediated any deficiencies that were cited. In the healthcare industry, deficiencies can range from minor administrative issues to serious quality and safety violations; providers with clean inspection records demonstrate consistent operational compliance.
Quality Measures (850/850): This sub-score is based on clinical and operational quality metrics reported to CMS, such as infection rates, readmission rates, patient safety indicators, mortality data, and adherence to evidence-based care protocols. A perfect score suggests the provider's reported outcomes meet or exceed performance benchmarks. It's worth noting that quality measure data is typically self-reported by providers and validated through claims data; a high score reflects strong reported performance against these metrics.
Enforcement History (850/850): This sub-score captures the provider's history of formal enforcement actions by CMS or state regulators, including civil monetary penalties, license restrictions, or corrective action plans. A perfect score indicates no significant enforcement actions on record. In the regulatory landscape, even minor enforcement actions can lower this score, so the highest scores represent providers with clean enforcement records.
What regulators in CA track for healthcare providers
The California Department of Public Health and CMS maintain oversight of healthcare providers through routine inspections and ongoing quality monitoring. Inspectors evaluate compliance with state and federal licensing requirements, which typically include staffing standards, infection control protocols, medication management, documentation practices, and patient safety procedures. Deficiencies are classified by severity and may trigger follow-up surveys or corrective action requirements.
CMS quality measures vary by provider type but commonly include clinical outcomes (such as hospital readmission rates or nursing home quality indicators), patient safety events, and care process measures. Providers are required to report these metrics regularly, and poor performance can initiate regulatory review or enforcement action.
Enforcement actions may be triggered by inspection findings, complaint investigations, or quality measure outliers. Responses can range from mandatory corrective action plans to civil penalties or license restrictions. Providers with histories of repeated violations or serious safety concerns face heightened scrutiny and potential loss of CMS participation.
Bottom line
WASHINGTON CENTER's 850 score indicates excellent regulatory compliance and quality performance based on CMS data. Before engaging with this provider, confirm that the specific services, location, and timeframe you need are relevant to this assessment, and consider gathering independent references or recent patient feedback to round out your evaluation.