What Verdica's 796 score means for Aaron Michael Lloyd
Aaron Michael Lloyd's composite score of 796 places him in the "strong" performance band (740–799), indicating a legal provider with solid compliance standing and no significant red flags in available regulatory records. This score sits just below the "excellent" threshold (800–850) and reflects a track record that meets professional standards without the highest marks across all measured dimensions.
For someone considering engaging this provider, a 796 score suggests confidence in baseline competency and regulatory compliance. The provider is not in the elevated-risk or acceptable-performance bands, which would warrant closer scrutiny. However, the score is not in the excellent range either, meaning there are areas where performance or history differ from the top tier of rated providers. Readers should interpret this as "qualified and low-risk," not "exceptional" or "elite."
The underlying data comes from Florida state bar disciplinary records and practice history—the official regulatory sources that track licensing status, complaints, and professional conduct. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed, so this assessment rests entirely on government and regulatory documentation.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This sub-score reflects Aaron Michael Lloyd's current and historical status with the Florida bar. A score of 790 indicates active, valid licensure with no license suspension, revocation, or lapsed status. It suggests the provider meets Florida's continuing education, fee payment, and regulatory filing requirements. A lower bar standing score would indicate administrative issues, inactive status, or reinstatement after disciplinary action.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This is a perfect score, indicating no substantiated disciplinary complaints, sanctions, or regulatory violations documented by the Florida bar. This is the strongest sub-score and reflects a clean disciplinary record. Legal providers with lower disciplinary scores typically have documented complaints—whether closed with no action, settled, or resulting in sanctions—recorded in state bar files.
Practice Profile (700/850): This sub-score is the lowest of the three and reflects the breadth, depth, and documented scope of professional activity. A score of 700 suggests a practice profile that meets baseline standards but may be narrower, newer, or less extensively documented than top-tier providers. This could indicate a smaller practice, specialization in a limited area, fewer years of tracked activity, or less public professional documentation. It does not signal misconduct; it reflects scale or visibility in regulatory records.
What regulators in FL track for legal providers
Florida's bar disciplinary system maintains records on licensed attorneys covering several key areas:
Licensing and compliance: Active status, continuing legal education completion, and annual registration fees.
Complaint history: Matters initiated by clients, opposing counsel, or bar staff—tracked whether dismissed, settled, or adjudicated.
Sanctions: Publicly imposed discipline ranging from reprimands and fines to suspension and disbarment, recorded with case numbers and effective dates.
Practice information: Field of practice, office location, practice type (solo, firm, in-house), and any publicly disclosed professional credentials.
Scores move up with clean records, stable licensing, and deep documented practice history. Scores move down when complaints, especially substantiated ones, appear; when licensing lapses or reinstates; or when practice profile data is sparse or inconsistent. The Florida Bar publishes these records publicly, and Verdica indexes them to generate transparency for consumers and business partners.
Bottom line
Aaron Michael Lloyd's 796 score signals a compliant, low-risk legal provider with a clean disciplinary record and valid licensure. Before engaging, verify that his specific practice area aligns with your legal need, request references, and review any engagement terms—the "strong" rating indicates trustworthiness in regulatory standing, not a guarantee of fit or outcome for your particular matter.