What Verdica's 796 score means for Alfonso "Alfie" Leon
Alfonso "Alfie" Leon's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating a legal provider with solid compliance standing and minimal regulatory risk. This score reflects a track record that meets and generally exceeds baseline professional standards set by the District of Columbia bar.
For a business owner or consumer evaluating legal services, a score in this range suggests the provider has maintained active bar standing, avoided serious disciplinary action, and demonstrated consistent practice activity. The score does not mean perfection—the highest band (800–850, "excellent") is reserved for providers with even fewer concerns—but it does indicate that regulators have not flagged material issues. A reader should interpret this as a provider suitable for standard legal work with established compliance habits, though as with any service relationship, independent verification of specific qualifications and references remains prudent.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790
This sub-score reflects Alfonso Leon's status within the DC bar's licensing and membership requirements. A score of 790 in this dimension indicates his license is current and in good standing—meaning he has met continuing legal education (CLE) requirements, maintained membership dues, and has no active licensing restrictions or suspensions. Minor deductions from a perfect score in this category typically reflect administrative lapses (missed filings, late CLE reporting) rather than substantive disciplinary issues.
Disciplinary History: 850
This perfect sub-score is the strongest signal in Alfonso Leon's profile. It reflects the DC bar's disciplinary records and shows no recorded complaints, sanctions, or ethical violations on file. In the legal industry, a clean disciplinary history is foundational; providers with this score have not been publicly censured, suspended, or subject to trust account violations, fraud findings, or conduct unbecoming an attorney.
Practice Profile: 700
This sub-score, at the lower end of the "acceptable" band (670–739), captures data on his practice activity and history—areas such as years in practice, practice areas served, and volume of work reflected in bar records. A score of 700 here does not indicate misconduct; rather, it may reflect limited practice history, a narrower practice scope, or less extensive publicly available track record compared to high-volume practitioners. Readers should note this sub-score does not measure client satisfaction or case outcomes, only the breadth and depth of practice activity visible to regulators.
What regulators in DC track for legal providers
The DC bar's disciplinary records catalog formal complaints, investigations, and sanctions involving attorney conduct. The infractions tracked include ethical violations (conflicts of interest, inadequate communication), trust account mismanagement, fraud, failure to return client funds, unauthorized practice, and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. Licensing data tracks bar membership status, CLE compliance, and any restrictions or reinstatement conditions.
Practice history records compiled by bar associations typically include information on years licensed, registration in practice areas, and any publicly reported malpractice settlements or judgments, though bar records themselves do not always capture malpractice claims unless they result in disciplinary referral. The absence of a disciplinary record does not mean zero complaints were ever filed—it means none resulted in a formal finding or sanction. Scores improve when providers maintain clean records over time; they decline when regulatory action is taken or when practice markers suggest reduced activity or eligibility.
Bottom line
Alfonso "Alfie" Leon's 796 score indicates a provider in solid regulatory standing with no disciplinary history and current bar membership. Before engaging his services, verify his specific expertise matches your legal needs, confirm references, and discuss his experience with similar matters—the score confirms he has not triggered regulatory alarm, but does not measure depth of experience in your particular practice area.