What Verdica's 796 score means for Anna Reese Yum
Anna Reese Yum's composite score of 796 out of 850 places her in Verdica's "strong" band (740–799), indicating reliable compliance standing and professional conduct based on available regulatory data. This score reflects performance across three dimensions tracked by state bar authorities: bar standing, disciplinary history, and practice profile. A score in this range suggests a legal provider with solid credentials and no significant red flags in the public record. Readers should interpret this as a baseline of professional trustworthiness—she meets and exceeds standard regulatory thresholds—though it does not constitute a personal endorsement and should be one factor among others (such as references, experience in your specific legal need, and direct communication) in your evaluation.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This sub-score reflects Yum's current licensing status and membership standing with the Delaware bar. A score of 790 indicates she is in good standing with the regulator and maintains active credentials. In the legal industry, bar standing is foundational—it means the provider is authorized to practice law in Delaware and has not faced license suspension or revocation. A score slightly below the maximum typically reflects routine compliance; it does not signal serious issues.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This perfect sub-score means there are no substantiated disciplinary actions on record with the Delaware bar. Disciplinary records capture complaints resolved by bar authorities, ranging from minor procedural violations to serious misconduct. An 850 score indicates a clean record—no public findings of ethical violations, fee disputes formally adjudicated against her, or sanctions. This is a strong signal in the regulatory sense.
Practice Profile (700/850): This dimension assesses the scope, consistency, and verification of her law practice as recorded in bar databases. A score of 700 (acceptable range) suggests her practice history is documented but may indicate less detailed or specialized credentials than providers scoring higher, or it may reflect a more recent practice timeline. Practice profile scores are informed by factors such as years licensed, practice area reporting, and verification of active engagement. A 700 is not a weakness—it simply indicates moderate depth in the available profile data.
What regulators in DE track for legal providers
Delaware's bar authority maintains disciplinary records on all licensed attorneys, capturing complaints, investigations, and outcomes. These records include violations of the Delaware Rules of Professional Conduct, which cover areas such as competence, diligence, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, and fee transparency. The bar also tracks bar membership status, continuing legal education compliance, and whether a provider has faced sanctions ranging from private reprimands to license suspension or disbarment.
Practice history data includes verification of active practice, areas of practice reported during licensing and renewal, length of licensure, and any gaps in active status. Regulators monitor whether providers are current on bar dues and registration requirements. This data informs assessments of whether a provider is actively engaged in legitimate practice versus dormant or inactive status.
Infractions that would lower scores include substantiated ethical violations, fee disputes, client complaints with bar findings, failure to maintain professional liability insurance (where required), or license disciplinary actions. Conversely, clean disciplinary records and consistent, verified active practice history support higher scores.
Bottom line
Yum's 796 score indicates a strong compliance profile with clean disciplinary history and active bar standing in Delaware. When considering engaging her, confirm her experience aligns with your specific legal needs, clarify fee terms in writing, and verify references independent of this score—regulatory compliance is a threshold, not a comprehensive quality assessment.