What Verdica's 832 score means for Anthony Lewis
Anthony Lewis's composite score of 832 out of 850 places him in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850), meaning the indexed compliance data reflects a strong regulatory standing. This score is built from three dimensions of public record: bar standing, disciplinary history, and practice profile. A reader evaluating this provider should understand that a score in this range signals low regulatory risk based on available state bar records. That said, the score reflects only what regulators and public databases track; it does not speak to client satisfaction, case outcomes, or service quality, which is why Verdica notes that no independent customer reviews are indexed yet. For a business owner or consumer, an 832 score is a positive signal on compliance and regulatory fitness, but should be one input among others—such as references, experience in your specific legal area, and direct communication—when making a selection.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (835): This measures whether a legal provider holds an active, unrestricted license and meets baseline regulatory requirements. A score of 835 indicates Anthony Lewis maintains good standing with the California State Bar. Providers with lower bar standing scores typically have license restrictions, probation, or inactive status. A high bar standing score means the provider is authorized to practice without encumbrance.
Disciplinary History (850): This is the highest possible sub-score and reflects the absence of, or minimal history of, formal disciplinary action by the state bar. Legal professionals can receive disciplinary marks for violations ranging from ethical breaches to client trust account mismanagement to failure to communicate. A perfect or near-perfect score here signals no significant or recent regulatory complaints on record. Lower disciplinary history scores correlate with substantiated complaints, suspensions, or other corrective actions by the bar.
Practice Profile (790): This sub-score captures the breadth and consistency of a provider's reported practice areas, experience level, and professional standing inferred from bar registration data. A score of 790 is strong but slightly lower than the other two dimensions, which is typical; practice profile data is often less granular than bar status or disciplinary records. This score reflects how a provider has represented their practice to regulators—specializations, years in practice, and professional associations—and whether that profile matches documented activity. Lower practice profile scores might indicate inconsistency, gaps in reported experience, or limited public record of specialization.
What regulators in CA track for legal providers
The California State Bar maintains public disciplinary records and license status information that Verdica indexes to build these scores. The bar tracks ethical violations under the California Rules of Professional Conduct, including misuse of client funds, failure to provide competent representation, conflicts of interest, and dishonest conduct. Licensing records show whether a provider is active, inactive, or suspended. The bar also publishes information on formal discipline (public reproval, suspension, disbarment) and, in some cases, less formal corrective actions.
Practice history data comes from bar registration filings, which require attorneys to report practice areas, office locations, and years of experience. Verdica uses this public filing data to score consistency and reported expertise. Regulators do not directly grade quality of work, but they do act on verified complaints from clients or opposing counsel. A clean disciplinary record means no substantiated complaints have triggered bar investigation.
Bottom line
Anthony Lewis presents a low regulatory risk profile based on available state bar data, with an excellent composite score and particularly strong bar standing and disciplinary records. If you are considering retaining this provider, verify that his reported practice areas and experience align with your specific legal needs, and request references or case examples to assess client satisfaction and results—areas that compliance scoring does not measure.