What Verdica's 796 score means for Arkady Tselner
Arkady Tselner's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and a track record free of major disciplinary issues. This score reflects baseline compliance across the dimensions Verdica tracks: current bar status, disciplinary history, and practice profile.
A score in this range suggests that a prospective client or referring organization can reasonably expect the provider to maintain active licensure and operate within established professional standards. However, a "strong" rating is not the highest possible designation—the "excellent" band (800–850) represents providers with even cleaner records or more extensive positive practice indicators. Tselner's position just below that threshold warrants the understanding that while compliance risk appears low, there may be minor friction points in his practice profile that prevent a top-tier ranking.
No customer reviews have been indexed yet, so this assessment rests entirely on regulatory data. That means the score reflects what state bar records show, not client satisfaction or outcomes.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This sub-score tracks current licensure status and whether the provider is authorized to practice law in Florida. A score of 790 indicates active, good standing with the state bar. Minor deductions in this band typically reflect administrative issues—such as late license renewals, continuing legal education deficiencies, or address-record discrepancies—rather than suspension or revocation. Tselner appears to maintain compliance with Florida's basic licensing requirements.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This is a perfect score. It indicates that Verdica's search of Florida state bar disciplinary records has found no public complaints, ethics violations, malpractice settlements, or sanctions against Tselner. A maximum score here is a strong positive signal and suggests the provider has not been the subject of formal regulatory action. It does not guarantee zero disputes have ever occurred, only that no formal disciplinary record is publicly indexed.
Practice Profile (700/850): This is Tselner's lowest sub-score, though still within acceptable range. Practice profile typically reflects metrics such as practice areas, years in practice, client volume indicators, or firm size and structure as reported to the bar. A score of 700 suggests either limited publicly available data on practice scope, a smaller or solo practice footprint, or practice concentration in areas with less extensive bar record documentation. This is not a red flag—many solo practitioners and specialists score in this range—but it does indicate less extensive verifiable data relative to larger or multi-practice firms.
What regulators in FL track for legal providers
Florida's state bar maintains disciplinary records on all licensed attorneys, tracking complaints related to ethical violations (such as conflicts of interest, client fund mishandling, or failure to communicate), professional negligence, unauthorized practice, and violations of court orders. The bar also monitors continuing legal education compliance, trust account audits, and fee disputes.
Verdica indexes these public records to compute the disciplinary history sub-score. A clean disciplinary record means no findings by the Florida Bar's disciplinary process. Practice history data comes from bar registration records, which include stated practice areas, office locations, and firm associations. Regulators use this information to verify active status and assess scope of practice.
Scores move downward when disciplinary complaints result in formal findings, when licensing lapses occur, or when practice profile data is sparse or inconsistent. Scores improve as practitioners maintain unbroken licensure and avoid regulatory findings.
Bottom line
Tselner's 796 score reflects a legally compliant practitioner with no disciplinary history and current Florida bar standing. Before engaging, verify his practice areas align with your needs and cross-check references or reviews from prior clients, since regulatory data alone does not measure service quality or client outcomes.