What Verdica's 796 score means for Arkady Tselner
Arkady Tselner's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and a clean disciplinary record. This score reflects compliance data aggregated from Georgia state bar records and professional practice history.
For a reader evaluating this provider, a score in this range signals low regulatory risk. The gap between 796 and the "excellent" threshold (800–850) is narrow, suggesting minor factors are preventing a top-tier rating rather than material concerns. Readers should interpret this as a provider who meets and generally exceeds baseline compliance expectations, though the practice profile sub-score (see below) indicates room for professional breadth or specialization clarity.
No independent customer reviews are currently indexed, so this assessment is based entirely on regulatory data—not client satisfaction or outcomes. That's an important distinction: regulatory compliance and client experience are different measures.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790 / 850): This sub-score measures active licensure status, good standing with the state bar, and any licensing-related restrictions or conditions. A score of 790 is very strong and indicates Tselner maintains full, unrestricted legal authority to practice in Georgia. Minor deductions at this level typically reflect administrative matters (late continuing legal education, late fee payments, or disclosure updates) rather than substantive fitness concerns.
Disciplinary History (850 / 850): This is a perfect score. Disciplinary history aggregates formal complaints, ethics violations, sanctions, or adverse findings by the state bar association. A score of 850 means no substantive disciplinary record has been identified in Georgia state bar systems. This is the strongest possible signal on this dimension and reflects either absence of complaints or successful resolution without formal findings. It is notably the highest-scoring sub-category.
Practice Profile (700 / 850): This dimension measures factors like practice areas served, client types (individuals, businesses, government), case types, or specialization credentials. A score of 700 is in the "acceptable" band and is the lowest of the three sub-scores. This does not indicate a compliance risk; rather, it suggests either limited information about practice scope, a narrower practice focus, or absence of specialized certifications or advanced credentials. For consumers, this means cross-checking the provider's website or contacting them directly to confirm they handle your specific legal need.
What regulators in GA track for legal providers
Georgia's State Bar of Georgia maintains disciplinary records and licensing data on all attorneys. Regulators track several categories of conduct that influence compliance scores:
- Licensing status – active, inactive, suspended, or revoked licenses; restrictions on practice areas or client work
- Disciplinary complaints – written complaints from clients, opposing counsel, or courts alleging rule violations
- Ethics violations – breaches of professional conduct rules (competence, diligence, conflicts of interest, fee disputes, trust account mismanagement)
- Sanctions – formal bar actions ranging from private reprimand to public censure to suspension or disbarment
- Practice credentials – board certifications, specialization disclosures, or continuing legal education compliance
- Disclosure compliance – timely filing of required registration, fee, or disciplinary disclosure updates
Scores move upward with clean records, active status, and full licensure. Scores decline with unresolved complaints, public discipline, or licensing restrictions. A provider with a strong bar standing sub-score and perfect disciplinary history has navigated these regulatory channels without significant friction.
Bottom line
Arkady Tselner presents a low-risk regulatory profile based on clean disciplinary records and unrestricted bar standing in Georgia. Before engaging, confirm his practice areas align with your legal needs—his practice profile score suggests that detail warrants a direct conversation—and consider requesting references or reviewing any independent reviews once they become available.