What Verdica's 796 score means for Arkady Tselner
Arkady Tselner's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" performance band (740–799), indicating low regulatory risk and a solid track record in Colorado's legal market. This score reflects data aggregated from state bar standing, disciplinary history, and practice profile indicators—the primary signals regulators use to assess legal provider reliability.
A score of 796 means Tselner meets or exceeds baseline compliance expectations across multiple dimensions. Readers should interpret this as a provider with no major red flags in recent regulatory activity and a professional standing that aligns with industry norms for active practitioners. The score is not "excellent" (800–850 range), which suggests room for differentiation in certain compliance or practice areas, but it does signal that regulatory risk is well-controlled.
For a business owner or individual considering legal services, this score provides confidence that the provider operates within established professional standards. However, it is not a guarantee of service quality, expertise in a specific practice area, or client satisfaction—those require separate due diligence beyond regulatory compliance.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790. This sub-score reflects Tselner's current licensing status and good standing with the Colorado Supreme Court's Office of Attorney Regulation. A score of 790 (out of 850) indicates the provider is licensed, current on bar dues, and maintains compliance with ongoing CLE (continuing legal education) requirements. It does not mean the attorney has never faced any questions; rather, it reflects the status as of the data snapshot. Minor administrative issues or resolved matters may result in a score below the maximum, but this score is substantially above baseline.
Disciplinary History: 850. This is a perfect sub-score, indicating no substantive disciplinary record indexed by the Colorado state bar. Verdica's data reflects formal disciplinary actions—ranging from warnings to license suspension—tracked by the regulator. A score of 850 means there are no documented violations, complaints, or sanctions in the state bar's disciplinary database. This is the strongest possible indicator in this dimension.
Practice Profile: 700. This sub-score is the lowest of the three and reflects data on practice type, client demographics, matter types, and other structural profile indicators derived from bar records. A score of 700 is in the acceptable range and suggests the practice profile is documented and compliant, but may differ from peer norms or include some variance in practice history (e.g., gaps, recent transitions, or limited public information). This score does not indicate misconduct; rather, it reflects what regulators can observe about how the practice operates.
What regulators in CO track for legal providers
The Colorado Supreme Court's Office of Attorney Regulation maintains several databases that feed into compliance scoring:
- Disciplinary records track formal actions: complaints filed against attorneys, investigations completed, and sanctions imposed (ranging from private admonitions to public censure, suspension, or disbarment).
- Licensing and bar standing data confirm current status, renewal dates, CLE compliance, and any lapses or restrictions on practice.
- Practice history includes admission dates, office locations, practice areas reported to the bar, and changes in status over time.
These data sources do not capture client complaints that were not escalated to formal disciplinary proceedings, reviews on third-party websites, or work quality assessments. Regulators focus on whether an attorney meets minimum standards—proper licensing, no serious ethical violations, and ongoing compliance. A high compliance score means the regulator has no documented basis to question the provider's right to practice.
Bottom line
Arkady Tselner's 796 score indicates a legally compliant provider with clean disciplinary records and strong bar standing. Before engaging services, confirm that his practice areas align with your needs, and consider requesting references or reviewing any available client feedback—regulatory compliance is a floor, not a complete substitute for evaluating fit and capability.