What Verdica's 796 score means for Barbara H. Agricola
Barbara H. Agricola's composite score of 796 out of 850 places her in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and a low-risk profile. This score reflects Verdica's assessment of her bar status, disciplinary record, and practice profile based on Colorado state bar data.
A score in this range suggests that a potential client or business partner can expect a provider with no major red flags in regulatory history and active, compliant bar standing. The score does not mean "perfect"—the "excellent" band (800–850) is reserved for providers with even cleaner records—but it does indicate that Agricola meets and exceeds baseline compliance standards. For most business owners or individuals seeking legal representation, a 796 score represents a trustworthy baseline from which to proceed with further due diligence.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790 This sub-score reflects Agricola's current license status and good standing with the Colorado bar. A score of 790 indicates active licensure without impediments such as suspension, probation, or lapses in bar dues or continuing legal education requirements. Scores in this range are typical for practicing attorneys in good standing; they don't indicate excellence so much as active, unencumbered practice.
Disciplinary History: 850 This is a perfect score, meaning Verdica's index of Colorado state bar disciplinary records shows no substantiated complaints, sanctions, or adverse actions against Agricola. A score of 850 signals a clean disciplinary record—no informal admonitions, suspensions, disqualifications, or public censures. In the legal industry, this is the baseline expectation for trustworthiness; providers without disciplinary history present lower regulatory risk than those with documented violations.
Practice Profile: 700 This sub-score, the lowest of the three, falls into the "acceptable" range and reflects data about Agricola's practice areas, focus, client base, or case load based on available public records. A score of 700 suggests that practice profile data is adequate but not exceptional—perhaps indicating a narrower specialization, a newer practice, or limited public case visibility compared to high-volume or highly specialized peers. This score does not imply misconduct; it simply means there may be fewer public indicators of broad practice scope or established reputation in the market.
What regulators in CO track for legal providers
The Colorado Supreme Court's Office of Attorney Regulation oversees attorney compliance through disciplinary records that track violations of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct. These rules govern attorney competence, candor with clients and courts, conflicts of interest, fee disputes, and fiduciary duties. State bar records also monitor licensing status, active practice authorization, and compliance with mandatory continuing legal education.
Regulators move scores up or down based on factors including substantiated complaints from clients or opposing counsel; findings of dishonesty, misappropriation, or neglect; failure to maintain required insurance or trust accounts; and unauthorized practice. Conversely, scores benefit from absence of disciplinary action, consistent license renewal, and completion of required professional standards. Practice profile data reflects publicly available information about specializations, bar association memberships, case outcomes (where public), and general practice indicators.
Bottom line
Barbara H. Agricola's 796 score indicates a provider with strong regulatory standing, no disciplinary history, and active bar authorization in Colorado. Before engaging her services, a prospective client should independently verify her practice areas align with their needs (given the "acceptable" practice profile score) and seek references or additional credentials relevant to their specific matter.