What Verdica's 807 score means for Brian McCaffrey, Attorney At Law
Brian McCaffrey, Attorney At Law scores 807 out of 850 on Verdica's composite scale, placing the practice in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects strong overall compliance standing based on available regulator data from the Arizona state bar.
A score in this band indicates that the provider has maintained good bar standing, has a clean or minimal disciplinary history, and operates a practice profile consistent with professional licensing standards. Readers should interpret this as a positive signal: the underlying regulatory record does not show significant compliance red flags.
However, the "excellent" classification is based solely on state bar records and practice history data currently indexed by Verdica. No independent customer reviews have been collected for this entity yet, so the score does not reflect client satisfaction, responsiveness, case outcomes, or other operational factors that matter in real-world engagement. The 807 should be read as "regulators have no major concerns on file"—not as a complete picture of service quality or fit for your specific legal need.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790 This sub-score reflects whether the attorney is in good standing with the Arizona bar—meaning the license is active, current, and not under suspension or restriction. A score of 790 in this category indicates solid standing. Any suspension, restriction on practice areas, or lapsed licensing would typically lower this score materially. This dimension is the foundation of regulatory compliance for any legal provider.
Disciplinary History: 850 This is the highest of the three sub-scores. A perfect or near-perfect disciplinary score indicates that state bar records show no (or very minimal) disciplinary action—such as complaints, sanctions, or formal findings of misconduct. In the legal industry, a clean disciplinary record is a baseline expectation, and this score confirms that expectation is met. Conversely, a low score in this dimension would flag a history of client complaints, ethics violations, or regulatory sanctions that regulators deemed serious enough to act on.
Practice Profile: 755 This sub-score is the lowest of the three and falls into the "strong" band (740–799) rather than "excellent." Practice profile typically captures factors such as licensing scope, areas of practice authorization, compliance with continuing legal education (CLE) requirements, and operational registration status. A score of 755 suggests the practice is compliant with these baseline measures, though not in the top tier. This might reflect a narrower scope of practice authorization, routine compliance rather than exemplary records, or other profile factors that do not rise to concern but also do not exceed standard requirements.
What regulators in AZ track for legal providers
The Arizona State Bar maintains public disciplinary records and practice history data that form the foundation of Verdica's scoring. Regulators track several key compliance dimensions:
- Licensing status and scope: Whether an attorney holds an active license, any restrictions on practice areas, and whether the license is in good standing or suspended.
- Disciplinary actions: Complaints filed by clients or third parties, investigations initiated by the bar, and any formal sanctions (warnings, reprimands, fines, or suspension).
- Continuing legal education (CLE): Compliance with mandatory professional development requirements to maintain licensure.
- Trust account and financial compliance: For attorneys handling client funds, audits and reports to verify proper management of client accounts.
- Practice location and registration: Current address and office registration to ensure the practice is legitimately operating.
Violations or failures in these areas would lower scores and flag potential compliance risks. Verdica does not have access to case outcomes, client satisfaction data, or internal firm operations—only public regulatory records.
Bottom line
McCaffrey, Attorney At Law presents a strong regulatory profile with an 807 composite score and no apparent disciplinary concerns on file with the Arizona bar. Before engaging, you should verify that the practice scope (practice profile sub-score: 755) aligns with your legal need, and consider requesting references or client feedback directly, since no independent reviews are yet indexed on Verdica.