What Verdica's 796 score means for Charles Eddie Floyd III
Charles Eddie Floyd III holds a composite compliance score of 796 out of 850, placing him in the "strong" band (740–799). This score reflects a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and minimal disciplinary exposure based on Georgia state bar records and documented practice history.
A score in the strong band indicates that a provider meets professional standards consistently and presents lower compliance risk than the general population. It does not mean perfect or exceptional—that threshold is the "excellent" band (800–850)—but rather that regulatory oversight has not identified material concerns. For someone evaluating legal services, a 796 suggests a provider with established credentials and a track record without significant red flags in the public disciplinary record.
Readers should understand that this score is anchored in objective regulatory data, not subjective quality judgments. It reflects what Georgia's bar association documents about licensing, standing, and disciplinary history. It does not measure client satisfaction, case outcomes, or price competitiveness—those require independent research and direct reference checks.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This sub-score reflects the provider's current license status, good standing status, and any restrictions or conditions on practice. A score of 790 indicates that Floyd maintains valid licensure in Georgia with no material impediments to practice. Minor administrative issues—such as late continuing education completion or license renewal delays resolved without discipline—can reduce this score slightly below the maximum. The fact that it remains in the high range suggests current compliance with bar membership requirements.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This perfect sub-score means that Verdica's review of Georgia bar disciplinary records contains no documented public discipline against Floyd. This includes absence of complaints substantiated by the bar's disciplinary counsel, ethics violations, malpractice findings, or sanctions. A maximum disciplinary score does not guarantee zero complaints were ever filed; it indicates that any complaints either were dismissed, resolved informally, or have not resulted in public disciplinary action on record.
Practice Profile (700/850): This sub-score, the lowest of the three, reflects Floyd's documented practice history and professional activity patterns as tracked by bar records. A score of 700 sits at the threshold between "acceptable" (670–739) and "strong" (740–799) performance. This component typically considers factors such as active engagement in continuing legal education, licensing tier (solo vs. firm vs. in-house counsel), longevity in practice, and any public or professional involvement. The moderate score here may reflect limited public-facing practice records, newer entry into a particular practice area, or lower volume of documented bar association activity, though without access to underlying granular data, specific reasons cannot be inferred.
What regulators in GA track for legal providers
Georgia's State Bar of Georgia maintains disciplinary records on all licensed attorneys. The bar tracks infractions including misappropriation of client funds, neglect of cases, dishonesty, unauthorized practice, failure to communicate with clients, and violations of professional conduct rules outlined in the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct.
Regulators monitor licensing compliance through active practice requirements, continuing legal education hours, and timely renewal filings. They investigate complaints filed by clients, opposing counsel, or the public, and publish substantiated discipline—ranging from private admonitions to disbarment—in searchable databases.
Verdica's practice profile component incorporates bar-recorded data on attorney activity levels, pro bono work, bar committee participation, and any publicly disclosed practice limitations or specializations. This data helps distinguish between active practitioners and those with inactive licenses or restricted scope.
Bottom line
Floyd's 796 score positions him as a low-risk legal provider based on regulatory records, with clean disciplinary standing and valid licensure. Anyone considering his services should verify the specific practice area and experience match their need, seek client references independent of this score, and confirm no unindexed complaints exist through direct bar inquiry.