What Verdica's 796 score means for Clark Fielding
Clark Fielding's composite score of 796 out of 850 places this legal provider in the "strong" range (740–799). This score reflects a provider with solid regulatory standing and a clean disciplinary record, positioned above the baseline "acceptable" threshold but below the "excellent" tier.
For someone evaluating Clark Fielding, a 796 score signals that bar regulators have not flagged significant compliance concerns. The provider meets professional standards and maintains good standing. However, the score is not at the maximum, which means there may be minor areas where performance deviates from the highest possible benchmark—or simply reflects the reality that few legal providers achieve perfect scores across all dimensions.
A reader should interpret this as: Clark Fielding is a lower-risk choice based on regulatory data, suitable for most business relationships, but you should still perform your own due diligence on specific service areas, fee structures, and whether their practice aligns with your needs.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790 / 850
This sub-score reflects Clark Fielding's licensing and professional registration status with the Connecticut bar. A score of 790 indicates the provider is in good standing with the state bar and meets baseline licensing requirements. This is not a perfect score, which could reflect various factors tracked by bar regulators—such as license restrictions, pending renewals, or other administrative notes—but nothing that jeopardizes active practice. In the legal industry, bar standing is the floor; providers must maintain it to practice at all.
Disciplinary History: 850 / 850
This is a perfect score, indicating no public disciplinary actions, complaints sustained by the bar, or sanctions on record. Disciplinary records are maintained by state bars and include matters such as ethics violations, professional misconduct findings, or regulatory penalties. A score of 850 means Clark Fielding has no such history indexed in Connecticut's public disciplinary data. This is a meaningful positive signal.
Practice Profile: 700 / 850
This sub-score evaluates the breadth, scope, and consistency of Clark Fielding's practice history as documented by the bar. A score of 700 is in the "acceptable" range and sits below the other two sub-scores. Practice profile data typically reflects the types of law practiced, length of active history, any changes in practice areas, and whether a provider's practice history is stable or shows gaps. A 700 suggests Clark Fielding has a documented, legitimate practice profile, but may have a narrower scope, shorter tenure, recent transitions, or less extensive practice history compared to providers scoring higher on this dimension.
What regulators in CT track for legal providers
Connecticut's bar, like all state bars, maintains public records on lawyer licensing, disciplinary actions, and practice credentials. These records form the foundation of Verdica's scoring.
Regulators track infractions including ethical violations (conflicts of interest, breach of confidentiality), competence failures, billing fraud, neglect of client matters, and misappropriation of funds. Licensing data captures active status, any restrictions, and renewal compliance. Practice history records document areas of practice, jurisdictional authority, and length of active engagement.
Scores move up when a provider has a stable, well-documented practice with no disciplinary history and full bar standing. Scores move down when regulators find ethics violations, sustain complaints, impose sanctions, or flag licensing concerns. The practice profile dimension is more granular—it reflects whether the bar's records show a coherent, consistent professional history or one marked by gaps, frequent changes, or limited documentation.
These measures are designed to catch fraud, incompetence, and ethical breaches before they harm the public.
Bottom line
Clark Fielding scores in the strong range with a clean disciplinary record and valid bar standing. The practice profile score is solid but slightly lower, suggesting a narrower or newer practice profile relative to other dimensions. For most business purposes, this is a low-risk provider—but independently verify their specific experience in your practice area and obtain references before engaging.