What Verdica's 796 score means for Deandra M Grant
Deandra M Grant's composite score of 796 out of 850 places her in the "strong" performance band (740–799). This score reflects regulatory standing and practice history data from Colorado's state bar, synthesized into a single reliability metric.
A score in this range signals that a legal provider has maintained solid compliance with bar standards and licensing requirements, with limited or no significant disciplinary action on record. For someone evaluating whether to engage Grant's services, a 796 score indicates a lower-risk choice compared to providers in elevated or high-risk bands—but it also means there is room between this score and the "excellent" threshold of 800–850. The gap of 54 points suggests either minor compliance gaps or a practice profile that diverges slightly from benchmarks Verdica tracks.
Readers should interpret this as: Grant has met core regulatory expectations and operates without major red flags, making her a reasonable choice for routine legal needs. However, the score is not perfect, and due diligence beyond this score—such as specific case experience, references, or fee structures—remains prudent before engagement.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790 / 850): This sub-score reflects Grant's current license status and compliance with Colorado bar admission and continuing education requirements. A score of 790 indicates her license is in good standing, though not at the maximum level. In the legal industry, bar standing is foundational; it confirms a provider is authorized to practice and has not had their license suspended, revoked, or restricted. The 60-point gap from perfect suggests either recent license activity, minor compliance notes, or other administrative factors tracked by the bar.
Disciplinary History (850 / 850): This is a perfect score, meaning Verdica's disciplinary records database shows no substantiated complaints, sanctions, or violations attributed to Grant. A maximum disciplinary score is a strong positive indicator—it means no state bar investigations, malpractice judgments, or professional conduct violations appear in the regulatory record. This is often the most important sub-score for risk assessment.
Practice Profile (700 / 850): This sub-score is the lowest of the three and warrants attention. Practice profile typically measures factors such as practice tenure, specialization clarity, client volume patterns, and alignment with standard service delivery metrics tracked by the bar. A score of 700 suggests Grant's practice profile is acceptable but may reflect a newer practice, limited public information about specializations, inconsistent volume, or other deviations from high-performing practice benchmarks. This does not indicate misconduct; rather, it suggests less robust or visible practice history data.
What regulators in CO track for legal providers
Colorado's state bar maintains disciplinary records on all licensed attorneys, tracking formal complaints, investigations, and sanctions. These may include violations of professional conduct rules—such as failure to communicate with clients, misuse of client funds, dishonesty, or neglect of a matter. The bar also monitors license renewal compliance, including continuing legal education hours and fee payments.
Practice history data typically includes tenure since bar admission, any public records of malpractice claims or settlements, and general licensing activity. Verdica uses these regulatory data sources to flag providers with suspension notices, disbarment, reprimands, or patterns of complaints. Scores rise when a provider has a clean record, established tenure, and no documented violations. Scores decline when investigations are pending, settlements are recorded, or compliance issues surface.
Unlike customer reviews or firm ratings, these are objective regulatory measures—not subjective assessments of service quality or outcomes.
Bottom line
Deandra M Grant presents a strong regulatory profile with no disciplinary history and solid bar standing. Before engaging her services, verify her specific practice areas and experience match your legal needs, and consider requesting client references or prior work samples to supplement the regulatory score.