What Verdica's 796 score means for Deandra M Grant
Deandra M Grant's composite score of 796 out of 850 places her in Verdica's "strong" band (740–799), indicating reliable regulatory standing and a professional track record without major red flags. This score reflects data aggregated from Georgia state bar disciplinary records and practice history—the primary sources regulators use to assess attorney fitness and conduct.
A score in the strong band suggests that someone considering working with this provider can reasonably expect compliance with core professional obligations. It does not mean the provider is perfect or risk-free; rather, it signals that available regulatory data does not reveal disqualifying issues. The three-point gap between Grant's current score (796) and the "excellent" threshold (800–850) is modest, indicating performance that is credible and well-documented but with room for distinction in at least one measured dimension.
Readers should interpret this score as a baseline compliance profile, not a guarantee of service quality or outcome. It is grounded in regulator-maintained records, not customer satisfaction or business performance metrics. No independent customer reviews are indexed yet, so this score reflects only what state bar data captures.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This sub-score reflects Grant's current license status and compliance with bar membership requirements in Georgia. A score of 790 is strong, indicating active, valid licensing with no apparent barriers to practice. In the legal industry, bar standing is the foundation—without it, an attorney cannot legally practice. A high bar standing score means licensing fees are current, required continuing legal education (CLE) credits have been met, and there are no active suspensions or surrenders on record.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This is a perfect score, indicating that Verdica's review of Georgia state bar disciplinary records found no substantiated complaints, sanctions, or ethical violations on file. This is the most protective signal available in regulatory data. A perfect disciplinary score does not mean a lawyer has never faced a complaint, but rather that any complaints either were dismissed, resolved favorably, or are not reflected in the indexed disciplinary database.
Practice Profile (700/850): This is the lowest of the three sub-scores, though still within acceptable range (670–739 is the "acceptable" band). Practice profile typically measures factors such as licensing history duration, scope of practice areas, and any gaps or inconsistencies in regulatory filings. A score of 700 suggests some limitation or variance here—for example, a narrower or newer practice profile compared to peers, or incomplete detail in public records. This does not indicate misconduct; it reflects what is knowable from practice history data.
What regulators in GA track for legal providers
Georgia's State Bar of Georgia maintains two primary compliance tracks. Disciplinary records document complaints, investigations, and sanctions related to professional conduct violations—such as mishandling client funds, breach of confidentiality, neglect, dishonesty, or unauthorized practice. These records are public and form the basis of Verdica's disciplinary history sub-score.
Practice history includes license status, CLE compliance, bar admission date, practice address changes, and any voluntary surrenders or inactive status periods. Regulators monitor these metrics to ensure attorneys remain current and accountable. Gaps in licensing, inactive periods, or frequent address changes may lower a practice profile score.
Infractions that would materially lower scores include: active disciplinary matters, license suspension or revocation, client trust account violations, and criminal convictions. Minor issues—such as late CLE filing or single minor grievance—typically resolve without lasting score impact if addressed.
Bottom line
Deandra M Grant presents a strong regulatory profile with no disciplinary history flagged and valid bar standing. Someone considering engaging her services should treat this score as a positive baseline indicator and supplement it by confirming current contact information, requesting references, and clarifying the specific legal work scope needed.