What Verdica's 796 score means for Edgar Poghosyan
Edgar Poghosyan's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in Verdica's "strong" performance band (740–799). This score reflects a legal provider with a solid compliance profile based on available regulatory data from Georgia's bar records and practice history. The grade-A designation signals that, according to the underlying data sources, Poghosyan meets or exceeds baseline professional standards in most areas measured.
A score in this range typically indicates low regulatory friction and a practice history that does not raise significant red flags to state bar overseers. However, it is not the highest tier; the excellent band (800–850) is reserved for providers with even cleaner records or more extensive positive indicators. For someone considering engaging Poghosyan's services, a 796 suggests reasonable confidence in professional standing, though independent verification through customer references or direct inquiry remains prudent, especially since no customer reviews are currently indexed in Verdica's database for this provider.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790
This sub-score measures whether Poghosyan maintains an active, unencumbered license to practice law in Georgia and whether there are any formal licensing restrictions or probationary conditions. A score of 790 is within the strong range, indicating that his bar standing is solid. This does not mean a perfect record—minor administrative issues or resolved matters may be reflected—but it does mean no active suspension, surrender of license, or substantial licensing impediment.
Disciplinary History: 850
This is a perfect sub-score and reflects Verdica's finding that, based on Georgia bar disciplinary records, there is no record of formal discipline against Poghosyan or the record is exceptionally clean. In the legal industry, disciplinary history is weighted heavily because it directly signals adherence to ethics rules, client trust accounts, professional conduct standards, and fiduciary obligations. A perfect score here is a meaningful indicator.
Practice Profile: 700
This sub-score sits in the acceptable range (670–739 boundary). Practice profile typically captures factors such as practice duration, scope of practice areas, jurisdiction experience, and possibly complaint patterns or regulatory notes that do not rise to formal discipline. A score of 700 suggests a standard or narrower practice footprint, less extensive tenure, or limited data in the public record compared to highly established practitioners. This is neither a warning sign nor a mark of distinction; it reflects an ordinary or developing practice profile by regulatory measures.
What regulators in GA track for legal providers
Georgia's State Bar of Georgia maintains disciplinary records that track attorney conduct violations including misappropriation of client funds, neglect of client matters, fraud, false statements to courts, unauthorized practice, and breaches of confidentiality. The state bar also monitors bar membership status, continuing legal education compliance, and fee-dispute resolutions. Verdica's scoring incorporates these public disciplinary records and any sanctions issued (ranging from admonishment to disbarment) as well as practice history metadata such as years in practice, license status, and any restrictions.
Regulators use these records to protect the public from incompetent or unethical practitioners. High scores reflect absence of or minimal adverse findings; lower scores may reflect outstanding complaints, settlements, or sanctions. Verdica's practice profile sub-score also reflects data density and clarity in the public record—newer practitioners or those with limited public footprints may have lower sub-scores not due to misconduct but due to limited verifiable history.
Bottom line
Poghosyan presents a strong compliance profile with an unblemished disciplinary record and solid bar standing. Before engaging his services, confirm his current areas of practice, request references, and verify his availability and fee structure directly, particularly because no independent customer reviews are yet indexed for him on Verdica.