What Verdica's 796 score means for Edgar Poghosyan
Edgar Poghosyan's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and a track record that meets or exceeds baseline compliance expectations. This score reflects analysis of Florida bar records and practice history and suggests that someone considering Poghosyan's services should expect a provider without significant red flags in the disciplinary system.
A score in this range means the provider has maintained active bar standing and has not accumulated a pattern of substantiated complaints or sanctions that would raise material concerns. However, the score is not in the "excellent" band (800–850), which suggests there may be minor findings, isolated issues, or areas where practice metrics fall short of the highest tier. For a potential client or business partner, a 796 score signals that due diligence beyond the Verdica rating is still worthwhile—particularly around specific service areas, fee structures, and references from prior clients.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790. This sub-score reflects Poghosyan's current licensing and active status with the Florida bar. A score of 790 indicates the attorney holds a valid license and is in good administrative standing with the state regulator. This is a baseline requirement; any attorney without it would score substantially lower. The slight gap between the bar standing score and the composite suggests no extraordinary credentials or commendations are flagged in the record.
Disciplinary History: 850. This perfect sub-score is the brightest point in Poghosyan's profile. It indicates that Florida's state bar disciplinary records contain no substantiated complaints, sanctions, fines, or findings against him. In the legal industry, a clean disciplinary record is the most critical regulatory marker; attorneys with violations in this category face immediate trust erosion. A maximum score here means Verdica's review of state disciplinary databases found no documented misconduct.
Practice Profile: 700. This sub-score, at the lower end of the "acceptable" range, reflects Poghosyan's documented practice history and activity metrics tracked by the Florida bar. A score of 700 suggests the practice is active and in good standing but may lack indicators of specialization, certifications, or a long track record of notable engagement. This could reflect a newer or smaller practice, limited public documentation of case outcomes, or practice areas that are less heavily regulated or tracked.
What regulators in FL track for legal providers
Florida's bar disciplinary and practice records form the backbone of Verdica's scoring. State bar systems maintain databases of:
- Disciplinary actions: complaints from clients or opposing parties, substantiated violations of professional conduct rules, and sanctions ranging from warnings to license suspension or disbarment.
- Licensing and admissions: current bar status, jurisdictional admissions, and any restrictions on practice areas.
- Trust account compliance: audits and violations related to client fund management, a common source of disciplinary findings.
- Continuing legal education (CLE) compliance: whether the attorney meets Florida's annual CLE requirements.
- Malpractice and court findings: reported judgments or settlements (in some jurisdictions).
Scores move up when providers maintain clean records and active credentials over time. Scores move down when disciplinary records show pattern violations, mishandled client funds, failure to maintain competency, or repeat ethical infractions. Practice profile metrics assess engagement depth, specialization, and regulatory visibility.
Bottom line
Edgar Poghosyan's 796 score reflects a lawyer with a clean disciplinary record and valid bar standing in Florida, placing him in the strong category for regulatory compliance. Before engaging his services, you should verify his practice experience aligns with your specific legal needs, request client references, and confirm fee structures and service scope in writing—standard due diligence that applies regardless of his favorable Verdica rating.