What Verdica's 796 score means for Elliott H. Jung
Elliott H. Jung's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating reliable professional standing based on available regulatory data. This score reflects a provider whose bar status, disciplinary record, and documented practice history meet or exceed baseline compliance expectations in Delaware.
A score in this range suggests the provider has maintained good standing with their licensing authority and has no material red flags in public disciplinary records. However, it is not the highest tier—the 800–850 "excellent" band represents providers with exceptionally clean records or longer documented track records of compliance. At 796, Jung's profile indicates solid professional credentials worthy of consideration, but prospective clients should still conduct their own due diligence before engagement, as Verdica's scoring is based solely on regulatory data and does not capture client satisfaction, work quality, or specialized expertise.
No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for Jung, so the score relies entirely on state bar records and practice history.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This sub-score reflects Jung's current license status and standing with the Delaware bar. A score of 790 indicates the attorney holds an active, in-good-standing license with no apparent suspension, revocation, or active compliance holds. The slight deduction from a perfect score may reflect other administrative factors tracked by the bar (e.g., continuing education compliance status, fee payment timeliness, or address verification issues) rather than misconduct.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This is a perfect score, meaning Verdica's review of Delaware state bar disciplinary records shows no public complaints, sanctions, ethical violations, or misconduct findings on record for Jung. This is the strongest available signal from regulatory data and suggests either absence of complaints or successful resolution without formal discipline.
Practice Profile (700/850): This sub-score is the lowest of the three, at 700, yet still within acceptable range. Practice profile typically reflects factors such as how long the attorney has been licensed, any gaps in bar membership, whether the practice area is actively documented or verifiable, and consistency of reported practice information. A score of 700 may indicate a less extensive public profile, shorter tenure, or limited documented specialization compared to providers with higher scores in this category. It does not signal misconduct but suggests less historical depth in the available regulatory record.
What regulators in DE track for legal providers
Delaware's bar disciplinary records form the backbone of Verdica's scoring. The state bar investigates and publicly maintains information on ethics complaints, disciplinary actions, license suspensions, and reinstatement history. Infractions tracked include violations of professional conduct rules—mishandling client funds, conflicts of interest, neglect of client matters, dishonesty, and unauthorized practice. Licensing requirements include bar admission, active status maintenance, and continuing legal education compliance.
Verdica's "practice history" component draws from bar-reported information on an attorney's years of licensure, any gaps or reinstatements, and publicly available practice area designations. High scores in this dimension typically reflect longer uninterrupted licensure, clear specialization credentials, and consistent regulatory engagement. Lower scores may reflect newer licensure, career transitions, or thinner public records.
The regulator does not track case outcomes, client satisfaction, or fee disputes handled outside formal bar discipline, so Verdica's score is limited to official compliance and standing data.
Bottom line
Elliott H. Jung's 796 score indicates a provider in good regulatory standing with no disciplinary history on record. Before engaging, verify his specialization aligns with your needs, confirm references independently, and review any engagement terms in writing—regulatory compliance is a floor, not a measure of expertise or fit.