What Verdica's 796 score means for Elliott H. Jung
Elliott H. Jung's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and minimal compliance risk based on available state bar data. This score reflects that Jung meets baseline professional standards, has maintained active bar status, and shows no serious disciplinary history on record.
A score in this range suggests a provider suitable for routine legal engagements, though it falls short of the "excellent" threshold (800–850), which is reserved for practitioners with exceptionally clean disciplinary records and broader practice scope indicators. For a business owner or consumer evaluating Jung, a 796 score signals reliability grounded in regulatory compliance rather than exceptional distinction. It's a "proceed with confidence, but do due diligence" indicator—the kind of score that reflects a practitioner meeting professional obligations consistently, not one carrying red flags or regulatory strain.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790. This sub-score measures Jung's current licensure status and compliance with state bar membership requirements in California. A score of 790 indicates active, good standing with the State Bar of California. In practical terms, this means Jung is authorized to practice law, has satisfied continuing legal education (CLE) requirements, and has no suspension or restriction on his license. A lower bar standing score would typically signal problems like lapsed licensing, restrictions on practice areas, or active probation.
Disciplinary History: 850. This is Jung's highest sub-score and reflects a clean record with the State Bar of California's disciplinary system. A perfect 850 means no public disciplinary actions, complaints resulting in sanctions, disbarment proceedings, or ethics violations on the bar's public record. This is a strong signal that Jung has avoided formal complaints or has successfully resolved them without public sanction. In the legal industry, a spotless disciplinary record is baseline professional hygiene; it's what regulators expect, not a bonus.
Practice Profile: 700. This sub-score reflects the breadth, scope, and verification of Jung's documented legal practice history with the State Bar. A score of 700 sits at the lower end of "acceptable" (670–739 boundary), suggesting limited or narrowly documented practice information in state bar records. This could indicate a specialized practice area with fewer recorded transactions, a newer practitioner, or limited public-facing case history. It does not signal misconduct; rather, it suggests Jung's practice may not be extensively documented in the data sources Verdica indexes.
What regulators in CA track for legal providers
The State Bar of California maintains two primary regulatory datasets that Verdica uses: disciplinary records and practice history filings.
Disciplinary records track formal complaints, investigations, and sanctions. These include violations such as misappropriation of client funds, gross negligence, failure to communicate with clients, failure to return client property, dishonesty, and violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Sanctions can range from private admonitions to public censure, suspension, or disbarment. A clean disciplinary record, like Jung's 850 sub-score, means no public disciplinary history on file.
Practice history documents reflect verified information about a lawyer's practice areas, years in practice, firm affiliations, and client engagement scope. This data comes from bar registration forms, voluntary practice disclosures, and verification against public legal databases. A moderate practice profile score (like 700) often reflects limited data available in these sources, which is common for solo practitioners or those in specialized practices.
Regulators also monitor bar dues compliance, CLE hour completion, and fitness-and-character evaluations required for licensure renewal.
Bottom line
Jung's 796 score reflects a legally compliant provider with no disciplinary baggage and active bar standing. Before engaging, verify that his practice areas align with your legal needs and cross-check references or case outcomes directly—the score confirms regulatory compliance, not expertise or results in your specific matter.