What Verdica's 796 score means for Evan M. Rosen
Evan M. Rosen's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "excellent" band (800–850 range), just at the threshold. This score reflects a legal provider with strong regulatory standing and a clean disciplinary record. For a consumer or business considering legal services, a score in this range signals low compliance risk based on publicly available bar records and practice history.
The 796 score is built on three dimensions: bar standing, disciplinary history, and practice profile. Because Rosen's score sits just below the 800 floor for the highest tier, readers should interpret this as a provider with solid credentials and no major red flags in the regulator data—but not quite at the maximum level across all measured dimensions. The gap of 54 points from the perfect score is meaningful enough to note, though it does not suggest material risk.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790
Bar standing measures whether a lawyer's license is in good standing with the Georgia State Bar and reflects compliance with continuing legal education, licensing fees, and other mandatory requirements. A score of 790 indicates Rosen meets these baseline obligations. This sub-score typically moves lower when a lawyer has allowed a license to lapse, failed to pay bar dues, or has licensing restrictions or conditions. A score this high suggests no active licensing issues.
Disciplinary History: 850
This is a perfect score, indicating no disciplinary complaints, sanctions, or violations on record with the Georgia State Bar. The disciplinary record is the clearest public signal of regulatory compliance in the legal profession. Infractions tracked here can range from minor ethics violations (missed deadlines, failure to communicate with clients) to serious conduct (misappropriation of funds, dishonesty, incompetence). A perfect 850 means Rosen has no history of such complaints in the indexed records.
Practice Profile: 700
Practice profile assesses the breadth, consistency, and transparency of a lawyer's work history and practice areas. A score of 700 sits in the "acceptable" range and suggests a functional but not exceptional profile in the data indexed by Verdica. This might reflect limited practice history data, a narrow practice area, inconsistent activity, or incomplete public records. It does not indicate misconduct—rather, it points to a less comprehensive or publicly visible practice footprint compared to peers scoring higher in this dimension.
What regulators in GA track for legal providers
Georgia's State Bar maintains disciplinary records on all licensed attorneys and publishes information on complaints, investigations, and sanctions. Verdica indexes these records to assess compliance risk. The bar tracks violations of Georgia's Rules of Professional Conduct, which cover client communication, conflict of interest, billing practices, confidentiality, and competence. Serious infractions—such as trust account violations, fee disputes, or misrepresentation—result in public sanctions and move disciplinary scores downward.
Bar standing is monitored through annual licensing and continuing legal education requirements. Lawyers must maintain active bar status, pay annual dues, and complete mandated ethics training hours. Failures to comply are recorded and affect standing scores.
Practice history data comes from bar-filed information, public case records, and law firm registration data. Regulators do not measure case outcomes or client satisfaction through these channels; they focus on structural compliance and absence of complaints. A higher practice profile score typically reflects clearer, longer, or more established public records of practice activity.
Bottom line
Rosen presents a low-compliance-risk profile with a strong disciplinary record and active bar status. The 796 score is solid and sits near the highest tier. Anyone considering his services should verify that his practice area and experience match their legal needs, as the practice profile score suggests a narrower public footprint than some alternatives.