What Verdica's 796 score means for Gregory C. Starkey
A composite score of 796 places Gregory C. Starkey in the "strong" band (740–799), which reflects reliable professional standing based on available regulatory data. This score sits near the top of the strong tier and signals that Verdica's assessment found no major red flags in bar standing or disciplinary history.
For a reader evaluating this provider, a score in this range typically indicates someone with a clean or near-clean compliance record and active, documented practice. It does not guarantee expertise, client satisfaction, or outcome quality—those require separate due diligence—but it does suggest the provider meets baseline professional and ethical standards set by Colorado regulators. The score is built on objective, third-party data (state bar records), not on marketing claims or self-reporting.
That said, this score is not in the "excellent" band (800–850), which means there are observable areas where the practice profile falls short of top-tier standards. A reader should treat this as a qualified green light: appropriate for most routine legal needs, but worth asking follow-up questions before engaging for high-stakes or specialized matters.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790): This sub-score reflects the provider's current license status and formal standing with the Colorado bar. A score of 790 indicates active, current licensure with no suspension, disbarment, or license restrictions on record. In plain terms: the provider is legally authorized to practice. This score is very high but not perfect, suggesting there may be minor administrative notes or historical issues that have been resolved.
Disciplinary History (850): This is a perfect score, indicating no substantiated disciplinary complaints, sanctions, or ethics violations in Colorado's state bar records. This is the strongest possible indicator of compliance with professional conduct rules. It means Verdica found no record of client complaints that led to bar action, fee disputes that triggered sanctions, or violations of professional responsibility rules. This dimension is foundational to trust in the legal profession.
Practice Profile (700): This sub-score is the lowest of the three and sits in the "acceptable" range (670–739). Practice profile typically reflects the scope, structure, and transparency of the provider's work—things like whether they maintain a documented practice area, whether they have peer recognition or specialty credentials, or whether their practice description is clear and verifiable. A score of 700 suggests the provider operates a legitimate practice but may lack specialization documentation, peer endorsement, or other markers of practice maturity. This does not indicate misconduct; rather, it reflects gaps in professional positioning or verification.
What regulators in CO track for legal providers
Colorado's state bar (the Supreme Court's Regulation of Attorneys) maintains disciplinary records that track violations of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct. These include ethical breaches such as neglect, dishonesty, conflicts of interest, fee disputes, mishandling of client funds, and unauthorized practice. The bar also maintains records of license status, continuing legal education compliance, and fitness determinations.
Practice history data includes registration details, active practice areas, and any public sanctions or restrictions. Regulators monitor whether a provider maintains professional liability insurance, has clear engagement terms, and responds to bar inquiries. Low scores in this dimension can signal vague practice descriptions, multiple jurisdictions without clear coordination, or lack of verifiable specialization. Movement in practice profile scores often reflects changes in documentation, certification status, or public profile rather than misconduct per se.
Bottom line
Gregory C. Starkey scores in the strong range with an excellent disciplinary record and solid bar standing. Before engaging, confirm that his practice profile and experience align with your specific legal need—the lower practice score suggests you should verify his relevant expertise and track record for your matter directly.