What Verdica's 796 score means for Gregory C. Starkey
Gregory C. Starkey's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating compliance and professional standing well above the midpoint. This score reflects data drawn from Connecticut state bar records and practice history—the primary regulatory touchstones for attorney accountability. A reader should interpret this as: Starkey meets professional licensing standards and has not accumulated a pattern of regulatory flags that would elevate his risk profile. That said, a score of 796 is not in the "excellent" tier (800–850), meaning there are measurable areas where his profile diverges from the highest compliance marks. For business owners or individuals considering legal services, a "strong" score signals reasonable confidence in regulatory standing, but it's worth understanding what's driving the variance before engagement.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790): This sub-score indicates Starkey's current licensing and professional eligibility status in Connecticut. A score of 790 in this dimension is high and suggests he maintains active bar membership without licensing suspensions, revocations, or status restrictions. In plain terms: he is legally authorized to practice law in the state.
Disciplinary History (850): This is a perfect sub-score, reflecting the absence of formal disciplinary complaints, sanctions, or adverse findings in the Connecticut bar's public record. A perfect score in this dimension is significant because it means no documented pattern of ethics violations, malpractice settlements reported to the bar, or regulatory censures. This is one of the strongest available signals in legal compliance data.
Practice Profile (700): This sub-score is notably lower than the other two, at 700. Practice profile typically aggregates data about practice type, client base, experience level, and specialization profile as tracked by bar records. A score of 700 in this dimension does not suggest misconduct; rather, it may reflect factors such as shorter tenure, limited public case history, a narrower practice focus, or other structural features that make practice history less extensive in the public record. This is an acceptable score but indicates less documented practice depth than the disciplinary and bar standing metrics reflect.
What regulators in CT track for legal providers
Connecticut's state bar, through its disciplinary authority, maintains records on attorney conduct, ethics complaints, and licensing eligibility. Regulators track several key compliance dimensions:
- Licensing status: Current bar admission, good standing requirements, and any lapses or reinstatement history.
- Disciplinary complaints and findings: Formal ethics violations (conflict of interest, failure to communicate, mishandling client funds, dishonesty), sanctions, and reprimands.
- Practice history: Years of practice, areas of specialization, and scope of practice as disclosed to the bar.
- Reportable events: Malpractice settlements, criminal convictions, and adverse judgments that trigger bar notification.
Scores move up or down based on the absence or presence of negative findings. A clean disciplinary record—which Starkey has—is weighted heavily because it demonstrates consistent adherence to professional ethics rules. Practice profile metrics provide context about whether an attorney has substantial, documented practice history. Gaps, inconsistencies, or limited public record history can lower this component even when conduct is unblemished.
Bottom line
Gregory C. Starkey's 796 score indicates strong regulatory standing with no disciplinary history, supporting reasonable confidence in professional compliance. Anyone considering his services should verify that his practice profile (the lower sub-score) aligns with their specific legal needs—for example, confirming his experience level and specialization match the matter at hand. A direct conversation about track record in your particular area of law is a sensible next step.