What Verdica's 807 score means for H. Kent Hollins, Attorney at Law, P.A
H. Kent Hollins, Attorney at Law, P.A scores 807 out of 850 on Verdica's composite scale, placing the firm in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects a strong compliance and regulatory standing based on Kansas bar records and practice history data.
A score in this range indicates that the firm has maintained good standing with state bar authorities and has minimal documented disciplinary concerns. For a business owner or consumer evaluating legal providers, this score suggests a lower regulatory risk profile compared to firms scoring in lower bands. However, the score is not perfect; the firm's sub-scores reveal some areas where performance differs from the maximum possible rating.
Readers should interpret this as a positive signal for reliability and regulatory compliance, but should also review the specific sub-score breakdown below to understand where the firm's strengths concentrate and where modest gaps exist. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity, so the score reflects only regulatory data, not client experience.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790 out of 850
This sub-score measures whether the attorney holds an active license in good standing with the Kansas Bar and whether there are any active sanctions, suspensions, or restrictions on practice. A score of 790 is strong but not perfect, suggesting the firm is licensed and authorized to practice, but may have minor regulatory flags or conditions that prevent a top-band score. In the legal industry, bar standing is foundational; any score below 750 typically signals active licensing issues or recent disciplinary action.
Disciplinary History: 850 out of 850
This is a perfect score and indicates no substantive disciplinary record on file with the Kansas Bar. Disciplinary cases cover a range of conduct—from ethical violations and neglect of client matters to financial impropriety and fraud. A perfect score here means the firm has not been subject to formal complaints, investigations, or sanctions related to professional misconduct as documented in state bar records.
Practice Profile: 755 out of 850
This sub-score reflects the firm's reported practice areas, experience, and profile data. A score of 755 is acceptable but notably lower than the other two sub-scores. In the legal industry, practice profile scores can be affected by limited public information, newer firms with shorter track records, narrow practice scope, or missing details in bar-filed data. This gap suggests the firm's public profile or practice history data may be less comprehensive than its disciplinary and licensing record.
What regulators in KS track for legal providers
Kansas Bar regulators maintain disciplinary records on all licensed attorneys and track violations including breach of fiduciary duty, mishandling of client funds, failure to communicate with clients, unauthorized practice, and violations of professional conduct rules. These agencies also maintain practice history—including licensure status, active restrictions, and any conditions imposed as part of disciplinary resolutions.
Verdica uses this regulatory data to compute sub-scores. Factors that move scores upward include active, unrestricted licenses and clean disciplinary histories. Factors that lower scores include open complaints, past violations, license suspensions or restrictions, financial impropriety findings, and gaps in practice verification. The bar also monitors continuing legal education compliance and professional liability insurance status in some contexts, though these are not detailed in the composite score breakdown provided here.
Bottom line
H. Kent Hollins, Attorney at Law, P.A presents a strong regulatory profile with an 807 composite score, driven primarily by a perfect disciplinary history and solid bar standing. Before engaging the firm, verify current licensing status independently, review the practice profile details available on the Kansas Bar website, and if possible, seek client references or specific case outcomes relevant to your legal needs—since no customer reviews are yet indexed for this provider.