What Verdica's 796 score means for James G. Perry
James G. Perry's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" performance band (740–799), indicating a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and minimal compliance red flags. This score reflects data drawn from California state bar disciplinary records and verified practice history—the primary mechanisms regulators use to assess attorney fitness and conduct.
A score in this range suggests that Perry meets the baseline requirements expected of practicing attorneys in California and has maintained that standing without significant disciplinary action or practice pattern concerns. Readers should interpret this as a positive signal: there is no indexed regulatory concern that would warrant heightened scrutiny. However, the score falls short of the "excellent" band (800–850), meaning there are measurable factors preventing a top-tier rating. Understanding what those factors are—detailed in the sub-scores below—will help you decide whether the profile aligns with your specific needs and risk tolerance.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790 This sub-score reflects Perry's current licensure status and compliance with ongoing bar membership requirements. A score of 790 indicates Perry is in good standing—licensed and authorized to practice in California—with no suspension, disbarred status, or active license restrictions flagged in state records. In the legal industry, bar standing is binary in nature (you either hold a valid license or you do not), but variation in the score can reflect the recency and verification of that standing, or minor administrative compliance matters. A score in the high 700s signals active, compliant membership without red flags.
Disciplinary History: 850 This is Perry's strongest dimension. A perfect score of 850 indicates no indexed disciplinary actions, complaints upheld by the state bar, or sanctions in the available record. This suggests a professional with no history of ethical violations, malpractice findings, or conduct that triggered bar investigation. In the legal profession, a clean disciplinary record is foundational; the absence of violations indicates compliance with professional conduct rules and client trust obligations.
Practice Profile: 700 This sub-score, the lowest of the three, measures the breadth, consistency, and transparency of Perry's documented practice activity. A score of 700 falls into the "acceptable" range and suggests that while Perry's practice information is verifiable through state bar records, there may be limited publicly indexed data about practice areas, client volume, specialization, or recent case history. This does not indicate misconduct; rather, it reflects information availability. Some practitioners maintain lower profiles or practice in ways that generate less public documentation. This dimension is informational and context-dependent.
What regulators in CA track for legal providers
The California State Bar maintains discipline records on all licensed attorneys through complaint investigations, bar proceedings, and public sanctions databases. Regulators track violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, including mishandling of client funds, conflicts of interest, failure to competently represent clients, dishonesty, and abandonment of representation. They also monitor licensing status, malpractice histories made public, and compliance with continuing legal education and fee disclosure requirements.
Practice history data includes verification of active licensure, any inactive or voluntary license status, and in some cases, information about the type of law practiced, jurisdiction, and office location. Verdica indexes this regulatory data to generate scores. Factors that lower a score include disciplinary findings, license suspensions or restrictions, and sparse or outdated practice documentation. Factors that raise a score include verified good standing, clean disciplinary records, and current, detailed practice information.
Bottom line
Perry's 796 score reflects a legal provider with a clean disciplinary record and current, valid California licensure—indicating low regulatory risk. Before engaging his services, cross-check his specific practice areas and experience against your legal needs, and ask for client references or case history, since the "practice profile" sub-score suggests limited publicly indexed background.