What Verdica's 796 score means for James Johnson
James Johnson's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating above-average compliance standing and professional conduct. This score reflects data aggregated from Colorado state bar records, including disciplinary history and documented practice profile information.
A score in this band means Johnson has maintained active bar standing without significant regulatory incidents on record. The 796 result is notably higher than the midpoint of the strong band, suggesting consistent professional accountability. However, it falls short of the "excellent" threshold (800–850), which typically represents providers with flawless or near-flawless regulatory records.
For someone evaluating James Johnson as a legal provider, this score signals that he operates within normal compliance parameters for Colorado. It does not guarantee quality of service or outcomes—only that state regulatory data does not show patterns of discipline or red flags. Readers should interpret this as a baseline measure of regulatory standing, not a full vetting. Independent customer reviews, case outcomes, and direct reference checks remain important next steps in any vendor selection process.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790 / 850 This sub-score measures whether Johnson maintains active, valid licensure and has not faced suspension, revocation, or other licensing sanctions. A score of 790 indicates he is in good standing with the Colorado bar, with no active bars to practice. This is a prerequisite for any legal professional; scores below 700 in this dimension typically signal licensing restrictions or recent reinstatement processes.
Disciplinary History: 850 / 850 This is a perfect score and indicates no substantiated disciplinary findings or complaints on record with the Colorado state bar. In the legal industry, this dimension captures formal complaints, ethics violations, trust account violations, unauthorized practice, or misconduct findings published by the bar. A perfect score means Johnson has not incurred disciplinary action or has resolved any historical issues fully without ongoing marks on his disciplinary record.
Practice Profile: 700 / 850 This sub-score reflects the depth and consistency of Johnson's documented practice history as recorded by the state bar. A score of 700 sits at the threshold of "acceptable" and suggests that available practice data—such as bar registration records, practice areas, and professional certifications—is present but may lack extensive supplementary credentials or specialized accreditations tracked by Verdica. This does not indicate poor performance; it reflects the volume or specificity of professional background information available in state records.
What regulators in CO track for legal providers
Colorado's state bar, like all state bars, maintains disciplinary records on licensed attorneys to protect the public. Key tracked metrics include:
- Licensure status: Active, inactive, suspended, or revoked
- Formal complaints and investigations: Allegations of misconduct filed against the attorney
- Disciplinary findings: Published outcomes when misconduct is substantiated, including reprimands, fines, suspension, or disbarment
- Trust account violations: Mishandling of client funds or escrow
- Ethics violations: Breaches of professional conduct rules (conflict of interest, unauthorized practice, fraud, etc.)
- Practice history documentation: Registered practice areas, firm affiliations, and years in practice
Scores move upward with longer clean records, active licensing, and documented legitimate practice. Scores decline when complaints are filed, violations are substantiated, or licensing restrictions are imposed. The Colorado bar publishes disciplinary decisions to maintain transparency.
Bottom line
James Johnson's 796 score indicates strong regulatory standing with no disciplinary history on record and active bar licensure. Before engaging him, verify his practice areas align with your needs, confirm references directly, and request information about specific experience relevant to your matter. This score provides a clean baseline; other due diligence steps remain essential.