What Verdica's 796 score means for Jerry Michael Blevins
Jerry Michael Blevins in Florida has earned a composite score of 796 out of 850, placing him in the "strong" band (740–799). This score reflects a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and a track record that does not raise material compliance concerns based on available state bar data.
A score in this range indicates that a provider meets core professional standards and has maintained good standing with the Florida bar. Readers should interpret this as: the provider has demonstrated consistent compliance with licensing and conduct rules, with no significant disciplinary history that would elevate risk. However, this is not a perfect score. The gap between 796 and 850 (the "excellent" threshold) suggests there are areas where the profile is strong but not exceptional—most notably in the Practice Profile sub-score, which trails the other dimensions.
For a business owner or consumer, a 796 score is generally reassuring: it signals a low-risk engagement with respect to regulatory standing and disciplinary background. That said, no composite score replaces direct vetting. A score reflects backward-looking regulatory data; it does not measure responsiveness, billing practices, case outcomes, or fit for your specific legal need. The lack of independent customer reviews indexed in Verdica's system means this analysis cannot speak to client experience.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790
This sub-score reflects Blevins's current licensure status and any issues flagged in bar records related to standing (e.g., late renewals, suspensions, or administrative non-compliance). A score of 790 is strong but slightly below perfect. It suggests active, good standing with the Florida bar, though there may be minor administrative notes or resolved issues on record. In the legal industry, a bar standing score this high typically means the provider maintains current credentials and has not faced license suspension or revocation.
Disciplinary History: 850
This is a perfect sub-score. It indicates no material disciplinary findings in the Florida bar's records—or if any disciplinary actions exist, they are resolved and have not resulted in sanctions or marks against the provider's record that would lower the score. A perfect disciplinary score is one of the strongest signals in a compliance profile. It means there is no indexed history of complaints, investigations, or sanctions that would raise red flags.
Practice Profile: 700
This sub-score is the weakest of the three, falling into the "acceptable" range (670–739). Practice Profile typically measures factors such as areas of practice, client base, peer references, and other indicators of professional activity and reputation based on bar filings and public records. A score of 700 suggests Blevins has a documented practice history that meets baseline expectations but may lack distinguishing factors (e.g., specialized certifications, extensive peer endorsements, or robust public profile data) that would elevate the score further.
What regulators in FL track for legal providers
The Florida Bar maintains comprehensive disciplinary records and licensing data that inform these scores. Regulators track adherence to rules of professional conduct, including competence, diligence, confidentiality, and honesty in client dealings. Disciplinary infractions range from minor (clerical errors, late filings) to severe (misappropriation of funds, fraud, criminal conduct). The bar also monitors continuing legal education compliance, trust account management, and adherence to advertising rules.
Practice history data typically includes bar registration, practice areas reported, years of licensure, and any administrative notes. Verdica pulls this public record data to assess whether a provider has maintained active practice and whether their profile shows stability or changes that might signal risk.
Bottom line
Blevins presents a strong regulatory profile with an excellent disciplinary record and solid bar standing. The Practice Profile score suggests his public profile is adequate but not outstanding. Before engaging, confirm that his areas of practice align with your needs and consider requesting references or client testimonials—areas that the composite score does not measure.