What Verdica's 796 score means for Jerry Michael Blevins
Jerry Michael Blevins holds a composite compliance score of 796 out of 850, placing him in the "strong" band (740–799). This score reflects a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and a track record that does not raise significant red flags for prospective clients or business partners.
A score in this range means Blevins has maintained good professional standing with the State Bar of California and has not accumulated a substantial disciplinary history. The score is built on three dimensions: bar standing, disciplinary record, and practice profile. Readers should interpret a 796 as an indicator that this provider has cleared basic compliance thresholds and operates within normal regulatory expectations. It is not in the "excellent" band (800–850), which would suggest an exceptionally clean record, nor is it in the "acceptable" band (670–739), which would suggest moderate compliance concerns.
For someone evaluating whether to retain Blevins or refer business to him, this score suggests a provider worth considering further, but not one so standout that a basic background check would be unnecessary. The score is data-driven and refreshed against state bar records, so it reflects current regulatory status rather than historical reputation alone.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This sub-score reflects Blevins' active license status and good standing with the California State Bar. A score of 790 indicates that his license remains in good order and he has not faced suspension, disbarment, or probationary status. The slightly lower value relative to perfect marks suggests there may be minor administrative flags or renewal compliance notes, but nothing that has resulted in license discipline.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This is a perfect score, meaning Verdica's review of State Bar disciplinary records shows no substantiated complaints, sanctions, or formal disciplinary actions against Blevins. In the legal industry, this dimension is critical because it directly reflects whether regulators have found evidence of misconduct, neglect, ethical violations, or fraud. A perfect score here is meaningful and indicates no public disciplinary record on file.
Practice Profile (700/850): This score reflects Blevins' actual practice history and scope as tracked through State Bar records and public filings. A score of 700 is the lowest of the three sub-scores, which typically indicates either a newer or smaller practice, limited public case history, or a practice focus that generates fewer indexed records. It does not suggest misconduct; rather, it reflects data availability and practice visibility. Consumers should understand that this does not diminish the bar standing or disciplinary scores; it simply means there is less public record detail available to assess practice volume or scope.
What regulators in CA track for legal providers
The State Bar of California maintains disciplinary records on all licensed attorneys, tracking complaints related to fee disputes, neglect, misappropriation of funds, dishonesty, and violations of professional conduct rules. Verdica indexes these records to flag any public disciplinary actions, suspensions, or disbarments. The bar also monitors active license status and renewal compliance.
Practice history, the third input, draws from public case records, bar registration data, and disciplinary file activity. Regulators do not grade "quality" in a subjective sense; instead, they track whether an attorney is actively practicing, whether complaints have been filed against them (regardless of outcome), and whether they maintain compliance with continuing legal education and other licensing requirements. A low practice profile score often simply means fewer indexed records exist, not that the provider is underperforming.
Scores move down when disciplinary actions are substantiated, when licenses face restrictions, or when patterns of complaints emerge. Scores remain stable when attorneys maintain clean records and active, compliant status.
Bottom line
Blevins presents as a strong, low-risk provider based on a clean disciplinary record and solid bar standing. Anyone considering engagement should verify his specific practice areas and experience align with their needs, and confirm his bar status independently if desired—but the regulatory profile does not suggest elevated compliance concerns.