What Verdica's 796 score means for Jonathan Perazzo
Jonathan Perazzo's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating above-average compliance standing based on available regulatory data from California's state bar. This score reflects an overall profile where bar standing and disciplinary history are well-managed, though practice profile metrics show room for additional documentation or transparency.
A score of 796 means Perazzo meets the baseline compliance expectations of his jurisdiction and has not accumulated red flags that would suggest elevated risk. Readers should interpret this as a provider with a solid regulatory track record, but not in the highest tier. The gap between this score and the "excellent" band (800–850) is small but meaningful—it typically reflects either minor gaps in documented practice information or minor historical issues that have been resolved.
For a business owner or consumer evaluating a legal provider, a 796 score suggests due diligence has already been performed through state bar channels and the provider has passed that threshold. However, it also indicates that independent verification through customer references, engagement agreements, and scope-of-work clarity remain prudent steps.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790 This sub-score reflects Perazzo's current licensing status and compliance with California State Bar requirements. A score of 790 indicates active, good standing—meaning his license is current and he is authorized to practice. It is not at the maximum, which typically suggests either recent bar record updates, routine maintenance items, or administrative notes in the bar's system that do not constitute violations but affect the completeness of his profile.
Disciplinary History: 850 This is Perazzo's strongest sub-score, at the maximum of 850. A perfect disciplinary score means no formal disciplinary actions, complaints upheld by the state bar, or sanctions are recorded in his file. This is a significant indicator that he has not been the subject of state bar complaints that rose to investigation level, or any such complaints were dismissed or resolved without finding. This signals low historical risk based on the regulator's data.
Practice Profile: 700 This sub-score, at the lower end of the acceptable range, suggests that publicly available practice information—such as area of law, years in practice, firm affiliation, or other documented credentials—is either limited, incomplete, or presents lower confidence signals. A score of 700 does not indicate misconduct; rather, it reflects gaps in verifiable practice history or lower transparency in available records. This could result from limited public documentation, recent entry into private practice, or a practice profile that does not align neatly with standard categorizations.
What regulators in CA track for legal providers
California's State Bar maintains disciplinary records on all licensed attorneys, tracking formal complaints, investigations, and outcomes. These records include alleged violations of the California Rules of Professional Conduct—such as failure to communicate with clients, mishandling of client funds, dishonesty, or incompetence. The bar also monitors bar standing, which reflects whether an attorney's license is active, inactive, suspended, or revoked.
Practice history is tracked through public records, self-reported information during bar membership renewal, and documented areas of practice. Regulators monitor whether providers maintain required continuing legal education, pay membership dues on time, and comply with trust account requirements if they handle client funds.
Scores move upward when disciplinary history remains clean, bar standing is current, and practice information is complete and verifiable. Scores decline when complaints are filed, investigations are opened, sanctions are imposed, or practice transparency gaps exist.
Bottom line
Perazzo's 796 score indicates a provider with clean disciplinary standing and current bar approval, suitable for engagement with standard commercial due diligence. Before retaining him, verify the scope of his practice expertise matches your need, request client references if available, and confirm his specific experience in your required legal area—factors this score does not measure.