What Verdica's 796 score means for Jonathan Perazzo
Jonathan Perazzo's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799). This means his compliance profile, based on state bar records and practice history, reflects a legal provider with solid standing and minimal regulatory concerns.
A score in this range indicates that Verdica's underlying data—primarily disciplinary records and practice credentials from the Georgia bar—shows no major red flags. The score is not perfect (the "excellent" band starts at 800), but it reflects a provider whose regulatory footprint is favorable and consistent with good standing requirements.
For someone considering working with Perazzo, this score signals that his bar credentials are intact and his disciplinary history does not contain material violations that would warrant caution. However, because this score is composite and the data is limited to regulatory records (not customer feedback or case outcomes), it should be one input in a broader due-diligence process, not the sole decision point.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790
This sub-score reflects Perazzo's current licensing status and compliance with state bar requirements in Georgia. A score of 790 is strong but not perfect, indicating he holds an active license in good standing and has met ongoing continuing legal education, ethics, and fee-sharing requirements. It does not suggest any suspension, restriction, or pending licensing action. Minor deductions from a perfect score in this dimension typically reflect administrative or technical compliance issues rather than substantive violations.
Disciplinary History: 850
This is a perfect score, meaning Verdica's indexed disciplinary records show no formal complaints, sanctions, or adverse actions on file with the Georgia bar. This is the strongest possible signal in this dimension—no history of client complaints that resulted in bar investigation or finding, and no public censure, suspension, or disbarment proceedings. A perfect disciplinary history score does not mean Perazzo has never faced a complaint; it means no regulatory body has substantiated a violation serious enough to generate a public disciplinary record.
Practice Profile: 700
This is the lowest of the three sub-scores and sits in the "acceptable" band. Practice profile typically captures information about license type, practice areas, years in practice, and whether the provider maintains any restrictions or limitations on their license. A score of 700 suggests Perazzo's practice profile is compliant but may include factors that warrant routine oversight—for example, a narrower scope of practice, recent license renewal, or a practice history that does not extend deeply into the field. This score does not indicate misconduct; it reflects the complexity or risk profile of his practice footprint.
What regulators in GA track for legal providers
Georgia's bar disciplinary system, overseen by the State Bar of Georgia, maintains records of formal complaints and sanctions against licensed attorneys. Regulators track violations including misappropriation of client funds, gross neglect of cases, failure to communicate with clients, false statements to the court, and breach of confidentiality. They also monitor ongoing compliance with continuing legal education credits, trust account audits, and ethics certifications.
Verdica indexes these public records to measure bar standing and disciplinary history. Infractions that lower scores include formal sanctions (censure, suspension, disbarment), substantiated client complaints, fee disputes resolved against the provider, and license restrictions. Favorable factors include clean complaint history, timely license renewals, and no record of trust account violations.
Practice history data reflects whether a provider holds a general license or restricted license, their stated practice areas, and their tenure. This data contextualizes risk; a recently licensed attorney in a high-turnover practice area, for example, may receive a lower profile score than a 20-year veteran, all else equal.
Bottom line
Perazzo's 796 score reflects a strong regulatory profile with clean disciplinary records and active bar standing. Before engaging his services, verify his specific practice areas match your needs, confirm malpractice insurance, and ask for client references—the score captures compliance, not case quality or client satisfaction.