What Verdica's 796 score means for Keisha Montgomery Torres
Keisha Montgomery Torres in DC has a composite compliance score of 796 out of 850, placing her in the "strong" band (740–799). This score reflects a legal provider whose regulatory standing and disciplinary history meet industry expectations, with some room for variance in practice profile metrics.
A score in this range signals that a potential client or referring organization can reasonably expect baseline professional compliance. The provider has maintained active bar standing and has not accumulated significant disciplinary flags in the state bar's records. However, the score stops short of the "excellent" band (800–850), which typically indicates exceptional consistency across all measured dimensions or an exceptionally clean regulatory record over an extended period.
For context, the 796 score places Torres above the threshold where most business owners or consumers should feel comfortable proceeding with standard due diligence. It is not a score that demands immediate red flags or extensive investigation, nor is it one that eliminates the need for basic vetting. Readers should interpret this as: regulatory compliance appears sound, but independent verification of specific experience, references, or service fit remains advisable before engagement.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This reflects Torres's current licensing and good standing with the DC Bar. A score in this range typically indicates active licensure with no suspension or revocation on record. The slight gap from a perfect score may reflect administrative considerations such as continuing legal education compliance status, recent license renewal processing, or minor administrative flags that do not rise to disciplinary violations. High bar standing scores are foundational; a score below 700 in this category would signal active licensing concerns.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This is a perfect score, indicating no disciplinary infractions, complaints, or sanctions recorded in DC Bar disciplinary records. This is a positive signal and reflects clean regulatory history within the state's disciplinary database. It does not mean complaints have never been filed, only that they either did not proceed to formal discipline or resulted in no sanctions being imposed.
Practice Profile (700/850): This sub-score sits at the lower end of the acceptable range (670–739 is acceptable; 740+ is strong or excellent). Practice profile metrics typically measure factors such as licensing scope (solo vs. firm), specialization status, jurisdictional authorization, and practice area concentration as tracked by state bar records. A score of 700 suggests some constraint or variation in practice footprint relative to benchmark data—for instance, a narrower practice area authorization, recent practice history, or limited multi-jurisdictional licensure. This does not indicate poor service quality; it reflects the regulatory characterization of scope or breadth.
What regulators in DC track for legal providers
The DC Bar maintains disciplinary records and practice histories that form the backbone of compliance scoring in this industry. Regulators track:
- Active licensure status and renewal compliance (affects bar standing scores)
- Formal disciplinary complaints and outcomes, including grounds such as failure to communicate, mishandling of funds, conflict of interest violations, or unauthorized practice (affects disciplinary history scores)
- Practice area authorizations and scope of licensure (affects practice profile scores)
- Multi-jurisdictional admissions and reciprocal standings (affects practice profile scores)
Scores move based on publicly reported disciplinary orders, licensing actions, and bar administrative records. Minor infractions, such as late CLE reporting, typically do not trigger major score reductions, while substantive violations (e.g., client trust account misuse, ethical breaches) result in significant score decreases.
Bottom line
Torres presents a strong compliance profile suitable for standard business engagement, with no significant disciplinary red flags. Before proceeding, prospective clients should verify subject-matter expertise, request client references, and confirm specific practice authorizations match their legal needs—particularly given the practice profile sub-score's midrange placement.