What Verdica's 796 score means for Keisha Montgomery Torres
Keisha Montgomery Torres holds a composite score of 796 out of 850, placing her in the "strong" band (740–799). This score reflects a legal provider with solid compliance standing and a low-risk profile based on publicly available bar records.
A score in this range signals that regulators have not identified significant disciplinary concerns, and that the provider's licensing and practice history align with state bar standards. For someone evaluating whether to engage with this provider, a 796 score suggests baseline trustworthiness—the provider has cleared the regulatory hurdles and maintains standing. However, this is not an "excellent" rating (800–850); there are measurable areas where the profile differs from top-tier performers. Readers should interpret this as a qualified endorsement: competent and compliant, but with some friction points worth understanding before engagement.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790
This sub-score measures whether the provider holds an active, unencumbered license and meets ongoing bar membership requirements. A score of 790 is strong but not perfect. It indicates Keisha Montgomery Torres is in good standing with the Connecticut bar—licensed to practice and meeting continuing education or other periodic renewal obligations. A lower bar standing score would signal license suspension, lapsed membership, or pending reinstatement issues. The gap between 790 and the maximum (850) suggests minor administrative gaps or compliance notes on file, though nothing that has triggered license action.
Disciplinary History: 850
This is a perfect sub-score and reflects the most favorable outcome: no substantiated disciplinary findings, complaints, or sanctions on record with the Connecticut bar. This dimension covers matters such as ethics violations, malpractice findings, fee disputes ruled against the provider, or conduct violations. A score of 850 means the state bar's public disciplinary database shows no adverse history. This is a significant strength and often the single most important compliance metric for legal providers.
Practice Profile: 700
This sub-score measures the breadth, transparency, and consistency of the provider's practice record. A score of 700 falls in the acceptable range and suggests some asymmetry or gaps between actual practice and documented profile. This could reflect limited published practice information, a narrow or specialized practice area with fewer publicly available case records, inconsistent reporting of credentials, or a shorter documented history in the bar database. It does not indicate misconduct; rather, it signals that the public record is thinner or less developed than it might be for a more established or heavily documented practice.
What regulators in CT track for legal providers
Connecticut's state bar maintains disciplinary and practice records that form the foundation of Verdica's scoring. These records track:
- License status and history: active, inactive, suspended, or revoked licenses; reinstatement proceedings
- Disciplinary complaints and findings: ethics violations (conflicts of interest, confidentiality breaches, neglect), fee disputes, misuse of client funds, and conduct deemed harmful to the profession
- Continuing legal education compliance: annual or periodic training requirements
- Practice registration: reported areas of practice, firm affiliations, and address history
- Public complaints and sanctions: reprimands, probation, monetary penalties, or license conditions
Scores rise with clean disciplinary records, active licensing, and consistent documentation. Scores fall when complaints are substantiated, licenses are restricted, or practice information is absent or contradictory. The system does not measure case outcomes or client satisfaction directly—those require independent reviews, which Verdica notes are not yet indexed for this provider.
Bottom line
Keisha Montgomery Torres presents as a compliant, low-risk legal provider with a clean disciplinary record and active bar standing. Before engaging, verify her specific credentials in your practice area, as her practice profile score suggests the public record may be limited, and ask for references or case examples if applicable to your needs.