What Verdica's 807 score means for Ken Litman Attorney at Law
Ken Litman Attorney at Law scores 807 out of 850 on Verdica's composite scale, placing the practice in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects compliance standing based on state bar records and documented practice history rather than client testimonials or subjective performance ratings.
A score of 807 indicates that this legal provider has maintained strong regulatory standing with Georgia's bar authority. The composite is driven primarily by three measured dimensions: bar standing, disciplinary history, and practice profile. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed, so this assessment is based entirely on official regulatory data.
For someone evaluating this provider, an 807 score signals low compliance risk according to available state bar records. It does not represent client satisfaction, case outcomes, or cost-competitiveness—only regulatory compliance as tracked by Georgia's legal regulator. A reader should view this as one input into a due diligence process, not a complete picture of service quality or fit.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790). This sub-score reflects Ken Litman's current license status and active enrollment with the Georgia State Bar. A score of 790 in this category indicates the attorney holds an active license in good standing and meets baseline regulatory requirements for practice. Bar standing scores decline when licenses are suspended, inactive, or subject to limitations. A 790 is strong but slightly below the sub-score maximum, suggesting no material licensing issues but potentially minor administrative factors.
Disciplinary History (850). This is the strongest component of the profile, at the maximum possible score. A perfect 850 in disciplinary history means no substantiated complaints, sanctions, or public disciplinary actions appear in Georgia State Bar records. This dimension is binary in impact: providers either have a clean disciplinary record or they do not. A 850 indicates no documented violations of professional conduct rules as tracked by the regulator.
Practice Profile (755). This sub-score measures documented practice history, credentials, and activity patterns as reported to or recorded by the state bar. A score of 755 is acceptable-to-strong and suggests the attorney maintains an active, documented practice. Practice profile scores can reflect factors such as years licensed, practice areas listed, continuing legal education compliance, or other regulatory metrics tied to professional standing. The 755 indicates solid foundation but leaves room within the scale for additional credential depth or longer tenure.
What regulators in GA track for legal providers
Georgia's State Bar monitors legal providers through disciplinary complaint processes, licensing records, and periodic compliance reporting. Key data points include:
- License status: Active, inactive, suspended, or revoked status
- Disciplinary complaints: Formal allegations of ethical violations under Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct (covering areas like competence, communication, conflicts of interest, and trust account management)
- Sanctions: Public reprimands, conditions, suspensions, or disbarment
- Continuing Legal Education: Compliance with annual CLE requirements
- Practice registration: Documented practice areas and firm affiliations
Scores move down when regulators receive substantiated complaints, impose sanctions, or identify licensing gaps. They move up when providers maintain clean records over time and comply with reporting requirements. Verdica's scoring does not predict case outcomes or client satisfaction—it reflects adherence to professional standards as monitored by Georgia's regulator.
Bottom line
Ken Litman Attorney at Law presents a strong compliance profile based on state bar data, with an 807 score and a perfect disciplinary history record. Before engaging this provider, verify that their practice area and experience match your specific legal need, confirm current fee structure and availability, and consider requesting client references or case examples relevant to your situation.