What Verdica's 796 score means for Kenneth B. Cole Jr.
Kenneth B. Cole Jr.'s composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and a clean disciplinary record. A score in this range reflects consistent compliance with bar admission and conduct standards, with no major red flags in the underlying state data.
The takeaway: This score suggests a provider who meets or exceeds baseline professional expectations. It is not the highest tier (800–850, "excellent"), which means there may be minor gaps or areas where practice profile data shows room for development. However, the strong standing should give business owners or consumers reasonable confidence in basic competence and regulatory alignment. The score should be read as "low risk, with attention to practice scope" rather than "no due diligence needed."
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790). This sub-score reflects Kenneth B. Cole Jr.'s current licensure status and any formal disciplinary actions recorded by the Colorado bar. A score of 790 in this category indicates active, good standing with no serious violations on record. In the legal industry, bar standing is the foundation of trust—it answers whether a provider is authorized to practice and whether regulators have found cause to censure, suspend, or revoke that license. A high bar standing score does not guarantee quality of service, but it does confirm that an attorney has met minimum regulatory requirements and has not been formally sanctioned for misconduct.
Disciplinary History (850). A perfect score on this dimension means no recorded disciplinary actions or complaints upheld by the Colorado bar. This is the cleanest possible record. Disciplinary history typically captures issues like client trust account violations, misrepresentation, failure to communicate, conflicts of interest, or other breaches of professional conduct rules. A perfect score indicates that no such infractions have resulted in formal findings against this provider.
Practice Profile (700). This sub-score is the lowest of the three and sits in the acceptable range. Practice profile data typically reflects the scope, years in practice, geographic service area, and specialization areas reported by or about the provider. A score of 700 suggests that while practice history is in order, there may be limited public information, a narrower scope, or fewer years of documented activity compared to providers with higher practice profile scores. This is not a red flag but indicates a less established or publicly documented track record.
What regulators in CO track for legal providers
The Colorado Supreme Court's Office of Attorney Regulation (OAR) maintains disciplinary records and licensing data that form the backbone of Verdica's scoring system. These records track violations of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct, which govern conduct such as competence, communication, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, and financial management.
Key infractions that would lower a provider's score include misappropriation of client funds, failure to return client property, false statements to regulators, unauthorized practice, gross negligence, and violations of client confidentiality. The bar also tracks compliance with mandatory continuing legal education (CLE) requirements and active license status.
Practice history data includes years licensed, practice setting (solo, firm, in-house, etc.), reported practice areas, and any gaps in licensure. Regulators use this to assess whether a provider's claimed expertise matches their actual authorized practice area and whether they have remained continuously active and compliant.
This regulatory framework exists to protect the public and maintain professional standards across the state.
Bottom line
Kenneth B. Cole Jr. presents a strong compliance profile with excellent bar standing and a clean disciplinary record. Before engaging, verify that his practice profile aligns with your specific legal needs, since that sub-score suggests a less extensive public track record than higher-ranked peers.