What Verdica's 807 score means for Kenneth E. Davidson, Attorney
Kenneth E. Davidson's composite score of 807 out of 850 places him in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850), indicating strong regulatory standing and a clean professional record. A score at this level reflects an attorney with no significant disciplinary issues, current bar standing, and a practice profile that aligns with standard industry expectations.
For someone evaluating whether to engage Davidson's services, this score signals low regulatory risk. It does not mean the attorney is perfect or that no disagreements with clients have ever occurred—rather, it means that no material violations or discipline have been recorded in Colorado's state bar system, and his license status is current and in good standing. The score is grounded in objective regulator data, not subjective opinion or marketing claims.
Readers should understand that a score in the 800+ range is relatively uncommon and represents the top tier of the Verdica index. However, there is still room between 807 and a perfect 850, which reflects minor deductions in the Practice Profile dimension (see breakdown below). This gap is worth noting but does not suggest imminent risk.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790. This sub-score reflects the status of Davidson's license to practice law in Colorado. A score of 790 is strong, indicating active, unrestricted licensure. Any material issues with license status—such as suspension, restriction, or administrative action by the bar—would reduce this score significantly. The 790 rating means Davidson is currently eligible to practice and has maintained compliance with bar membership requirements.
Disciplinary History: 850. This is a perfect sub-score, indicating zero substantiated disciplinary actions in Colorado's state bar records. Disciplinary infractions can include violations of professional conduct rules, failure to return client funds, misleading advertising, incompetence, or ethical breaches. An 850 reflects a clean record; this attorney has not been subject to public discipline, private admonition, or other regulatory sanctions tracked by the Colorado bar.
Practice Profile: 755. This is the lowest of the three sub-scores, though still in the "strong" range (740–799). Practice Profile typically measures factors such as specialization, years in practice, documented complaints (even if not formally disciplined), and alignment with regulated practice standards. A score of 755 may indicate minor data gaps, limited public documentation of practice scope, or other factors that prevent a higher rating. This does not suggest problems—only that the profile is less extensively documented than in other cases.
What regulators in CO track for legal providers
Colorado's state bar—officially the Supreme Court of Colorado's Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel—maintains disciplinary records and tracks attorney practice standing. The bar monitors:
- License status: active, inactive, suspended, or revoked.
- Disciplinary actions: formal complaints, hearings, and sanctions for violations of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct.
- Types of infractions tracked: unauthorized practice, neglect of client matters, misappropriation of funds, dishonesty, conflicts of interest, and incompetence.
- Public versus private discipline: serious violations result in public records; minor issues may be resolved privately.
- Practice history data: years of licensure, any restrictions on practice areas, and compliance with continuing legal education requirements.
Verdica's scoring incorporates these regulator-maintained records. A high score reflects consistent compliance; declining scores would typically follow documented violations or license restrictions. The state bar publishes disciplinary information to protect the public and maintain professional standards.
Bottom line
Kenneth E. Davidson scores in the excellent range with no disciplinary history and current bar standing, making him a low-risk choice from a regulatory perspective. Before engaging his services, verify that his practice area and experience align with your specific legal needs, and consider seeking references or independent feedback beyond the regulatory record.