What Verdica's 796 score means for Lance Lawrence Kennedy
Lance Lawrence Kennedy's composite score of 796 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and minimal compliance concerns. This score reflects an overall profile that meets industry expectations and shows no major red flags in the areas Verdica tracks: bar standing, disciplinary history, and practice profile.
A reader should interpret this score as a baseline of professional credibility. The provider is not in the "excellent" tier (800–850), which would suggest exceptional performance across all dimensions, but neither does the score suggest elevated or high-risk compliance issues. For a business owner or consumer evaluating legal services, a 796 means the provider has demonstrated consistent compliance with state bar requirements and has not accumulated significant disciplinary records. However, the score is not uniform across all sub-dimensions—the breakdown below explains where strengths and comparative weaknesses lie.
No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this provider, so Verdica's score is based entirely on regulatory data from Connecticut's state bar. This is typical for newly profiled providers or those with limited public review footprints.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790. This sub-score reflects Kennedy's current status with the Connecticut bar and compliance with active licensure requirements. A score of 790 is strong and indicates the provider maintains good standing with the state licensing authority. Bar standing typically tracks whether a provider is licensed and in good regulatory position; a high score here suggests no suspension, administrative holds, or licensing restrictions.
Disciplinary History: 850. This is a perfect score, indicating no disciplinary infractions or complaints on record with the Connecticut bar. A score of 850 means a clean disciplinary history—no substantiated violations, sanctions, or adverse actions recorded by the state regulator. This is a significant positive marker and represents the strongest component of Kennedy's profile.
Practice Profile: 700. This sub-score, at 700, sits at the lower boundary of the "acceptable" band (670–739) and represents the relative weak point in Kennedy's profile, though it remains within acceptable range. Practice profile typically reflects data on practice scope, specialization, caseload patterns, and compliance history as visible through bar records. A score of 700 suggests Kennedy's practice profile meets baseline standards but may lack distinguishing factors (such as extensive case history, specialization credentials, or other markers tracked in regulatory databases) that would elevate this dimension. This does not indicate misconduct; rather, it reflects comparative positioning based on available practice data.
What regulators in CT track for legal providers
Connecticut's state bar disciplinary system and practice records form the foundation for this analysis. State bars track several categories of data that influence Verdica's scoring:
Licensing and standing: Active bar status, jurisdictional eligibility, and compliance with continuing legal education (CLE) requirements.
Disciplinary records: Substantiated complaints, ethical violations, malpractice findings, fee disputes, trust account violations, and sanctions imposed by the bar.
Practice history: Length of practice, areas of practice, case disposition records (where public), and any limitations or restrictions on scope of practice.
Factors that lower scores in these dimensions include disbarment, suspension, public censure, trust account violations, fraud findings, repeated malpractice judgments, and compliance failures. Factors that maintain or elevate scores include clean disciplinary records, active good standing, and consistent practice history over time.
Bottom line
Kennedy's 796 score indicates a provider with solid regulatory compliance and no significant disciplinary concerns—a strong baseline for business consideration. Before engaging his services, confirm that his practice profile (the comparative weak point at 700) aligns with your specific legal needs, and consider supplementary due diligence such as references, fee structures, and case expertise relevant to your matter.