What Verdica's 838 score means for Laura Roberts
Laura Roberts' composite score of 838 out of 850 places her in Verdica's highest score band (800–850 = excellent). This score reflects strong standing across the regulatory dimensions Verdica monitors: bar licensing status, disciplinary history, and documented practice profile.
A score of 838 indicates that based on publicly available state bar records, Roberts has maintained compliance with New York's licensing and conduct standards. The 12-point gap between her score and a perfect 850 is typical and often reflects minor variations in practice data completeness or routine administrative factors rather than substantive compliance concerns.
For someone evaluating Roberts as a legal service provider, this score suggests low regulatory risk. It means the New York State Bar has no significant disciplinary findings on record, and her practice credentials are in good standing. Readers should interpret this as: Roberts meets the baseline compliance requirements New York imposes on licensed attorneys, and she has not triggered the kinds of violations—fraud, ethics breaches, unauthorized practice—that would materially lower her score.
This does not constitute a personal recommendation, nor does it speak to client satisfaction, value for money, or specific areas of legal expertise. It is a regulatory health check based on state records.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 850 Bar Standing reflects licensing status and active good standing with the New York State Bar. A perfect 850 means Roberts holds a current, unrestricted license to practice law in New York. She has met all mandatory continuing legal education (CLE) requirements and maintains her bar membership in full compliance. There are no pending license suspensions, restrictions, or conditional admissions.
Disciplinary History: 850 Disciplinary History captures whether the state bar has opened, pursued, or concluded formal disciplinary cases against the attorney. A score of 850 indicates no substantive disciplinary record. Roberts has not been sanctioned, reprimanded, or found to have violated the New York Rules of Professional Conduct at a level that generated formal bar action. A lower score in this category would typically reflect findings of misconduct, ethics violations, or settlements of complaints.
Practice Profile: 790 Practice Profile measures the completeness and consistency of documented practice information—areas of practice, years licensed, malpractice history (if public), and other structural data the bar maintains. A score of 790 is strong but slightly below perfect, which is common. It may indicate minor gaps in publicly available practice documentation, variation in how information is reported across state databases, or limited independent verification of all practice details. It does not suggest misconduct; it reflects data completeness.
What regulators in NY track for legal providers
New York's Unified Court System and the Department of the State maintain attorney disciplinary records and licensing databases. The state bar monitors several compliance dimensions:
- Licensing and good standing: active bar membership, CLE compliance, and fitness to practice.
- Disciplinary complaints: investigations and findings related to ethics violations, including misrepresentation, conflicts of interest, failure to communicate with clients, and trust account mismanagement.
- Malpractice and claims history: public records of malpractice judgments or settlements (where available).
- Practice credentials: bar admission date, jurisdictions, practice areas, and any restrictions or conditions on licensure.
Scores move downward when a lawyer has been found in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, faces pending disciplinary cases, holds a restricted or conditional license, or has unresolved complaints. Infractions can range from minor (administrative) to severe (fraud, misappropriation).
Bottom line
Laura Roberts holds an excellent regulatory profile based on New York state bar records. Her high scores across licensing, disciplinary history, and practice standing indicate she meets core compliance requirements with no significant red flags. Anyone considering retention should still conduct due diligence—verify client references, review specific experience in your practice area, and confirm fee structures—but her regulatory record presents low risk from a state oversight perspective.