What Verdica's 796 score means for Leon Roger Storie
Leon Roger Storie's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating reliable compliance standing and professional conduct. This score reflects a track record that meets and often exceeds baseline regulatory expectations in Connecticut. A reader should interpret this as: the available disciplinary and practice data show no significant red flags, and the provider operates within accepted professional norms.
The score sits just below the "excellent" threshold (800–850), meaning Storie has demonstrated solid professional standing but with minor gaps in the measured dimensions. For someone evaluating a legal provider, a 796 suggests low compliance risk and a reasonable basis for confidence, though it is not a guarantee of service quality or fit for a specific engagement.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This sub-score reflects Storie's current license status and standing within the Connecticut bar. A score of 790 is strong and indicates active, good standing without major licensing encumbrances. In the legal industry, bar standing is a foundational measure—practitioners must maintain a valid license and clear status to practice. A sub-score in this range signals that Storie meets this core requirement and has not faced license suspension, revocation, or serious restrictions.
Disciplinary History (850/850): A perfect score here means no substantiated disciplinary findings are indexed in Connecticut state bar records. This is the cleanest possible disciplinary profile. Regulators track formal complaints, investigations, and sanctions; an 850 indicates Storie has no public disciplinary record on file. This is a strong signal but does not preclude informal complaints, client disputes, or matters resolved outside formal discipline.
Practice Profile (700/850): At 700, this sub-score is the lowest of the three and sits in the "acceptable" band. Practice profile typically captures professional history, credentials, specializations, and any available structural data about how a provider operates. A score of 700 suggests baseline acceptability but may reflect limited published practice information, a narrower practice scope, or fewer years of indexed history compared to peers. This is not a warning signal but indicates less comprehensive public record data in this dimension.
What regulators in CT track for legal providers
Connecticut's bar disciplinary system, overseen by the Connecticut Bar Examining Committee and statewide bar records, documents formal complaints alleging violations of professional conduct rules. These violations can include misappropriation of client funds, failure to communicate, gross negligence, dishonesty, conflicts of interest, and unauthorized practice. Serious infractions result in suspension or disbarment; minor violations may result in reprimands or other sanctions. Verdica indexes these public disciplinary records to assess compliance risk.
Practice history data includes licensing timeline, active status, any prior jurisdictions, and publicly available biographical details. Regulators maintain these records to ensure practitioners meet continuing legal education requirements, maintain insurance where required, and disclose any restrictions on practice. Changes in bar standing—such as administrative suspensions for unpaid fees or unmet CLE credits—also appear in this data.
The absence of a disciplinary record does not certify competence, ethics, or client satisfaction; it indicates only that no formal regulatory violations have been substantiated and indexed. Clients or counterparties should still conduct independent reference checks and verify specific expertise relevant to their needs.
Bottom line
Storie's 796 score reflects a provider with clean disciplinary standing and solid bar compliance. Anyone considering retention should verify the practice profile independently—confirm areas of practice, recent clients or references, and specific experience relevant to your matter—to round out what the regulatory data alone can show.