What Verdica's 796 score means for Lissette Crescimone
Lissette Crescimone's composite score of 796 out of 850 places her in the "excellent" band (800–850), though just below the threshold. This score reflects a legal provider with strong regulatory standing and a clean disciplinary record, based on state bar data and verified practice history.
A score in this range indicates that a provider has maintained good standing with their state bar, has not accumulated significant disciplinary actions, and operates with a practice profile aligned with professional norms. For someone evaluating whether to engage Crescimone's legal services, a 796 score signals low regulatory risk—there are no red flags in the public record that would suggest compliance problems or patterns of misconduct.
The score should be interpreted as a snapshot of publicly available regulatory data, not a guarantee of service quality or outcome. It reflects what regulators and bar associations have on file, not customer satisfaction or case results. Verdica indexes no independent customer reviews yet for this entity, so the score rests entirely on official regulatory compliance metrics.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790 / 850): This sub-score evaluates whether Crescimone maintains active, unrestricted licensure in Connecticut and whether there are any suspension, disbarment, or reinstatement proceedings on record. A score of 790 is very strong and indicates current good standing. It does not mean a perfect disciplinary history, but rather that any past issues have been resolved and do not currently restrict her ability to practice.
Disciplinary History (850 / 850): This is a perfect sub-score, indicating no substantiated disciplinary actions, complaints, or sanctions in the indexed state bar records. This is the strongest possible indicator available in regulatory data. A perfect score here means there is no public record of ethics violations, malpractice findings, or bar-imposed discipline.
Practice Profile (700 / 850): This sub-score reflects the structure and documentation of Crescimone's practice—areas such as licensing currency, jurisdictional scope, business registration status, and alignment with bar-approved practice models. A score of 700 is in the "acceptable" range, suggesting her practice setup meets baseline regulatory requirements. It is the lowest of her three sub-scores, which is typical for many practitioners; it does not indicate a problem, but rather that there may be room for additional documentation, expanded licensing, or practice diversification relative to peers in the "excellent" band.
What regulators in CT track for legal providers
Connecticut's state bar maintains disciplinary records and licensing databases that track several categories of provider conduct:
- Licensure and good standing: Active bar membership, current fees, and disciplinary eligibility
- Ethics complaints and sanctions: Violations of professional conduct rules, including dishonesty, conflicts of interest, neglect, and fee disputes
- Malpractice findings: Court-ordered or bar-adjudicated malpractice determinations
- Criminal history: Any felony convictions or crimes of moral turpitude
- Reinstatement status: Whether a provider was previously suspended or disbarred and has since been reinstated
- Practice credentials: Verified business licensing, office locations, and practice areas
Scores move higher when a provider has a clean disciplinary record, active unrestricted licensure, and clear practice documentation. Scores decline when disciplinary actions, complaints, suspensions, or licensing gaps appear in the record. The practice profile sub-score can also reflect whether a provider's credentials are current and match filed business records.
Bottom line
Crescimone's 796 score places her in the strong-to-excellent range on regulatory compliance. Her perfect disciplinary history and solid bar standing indicate low regulatory risk. Anyone considering her services should verify that her practice areas align with their legal needs and, as with any provider, request references or case information to assess fit and capability beyond what regulatory data can show.