What Verdica's 796 score means for Lissette Crescimone
Lissette Crescimone holds a composite Verdica score of 796 out of 850, placing her in the "strong" band (740–799). This score reflects a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and a clean disciplinary record, but with some measurable gap in practice profile metrics.
A score in the strong band indicates that a provider meets baseline compliance expectations and poses low regulatory risk. It is not the highest tier—scores of 800–850 represent "excellent"—but it signals that a provider has maintained their bar license in good standing and has not accumulated significant disciplinary sanctions. For a business owner or consumer, a 796 score means you are evaluating someone who has cleared regulatory hurdles and has demonstrated responsible professional conduct over time. However, the score also suggests room for differentiation; this is a provider to vet against peers, not necessarily a default choice.
The absence of independent customer reviews indexed in Verdica's system does not count against this score. It simply means that no third-party feedback has been collected or published yet. That is a data gap, not a risk signal.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790 out of 850): This sub-score reflects Lissette Crescimone's current license status and active enrollment with the Delaware bar. A score of 790 is strong and indicates that her license is in good standing with no active suspensions, lapses, or reinstatement issues. In the legal industry, bar standing is the foundation of regulatory compliance; without it, a provider cannot legally practice. A score below 700 in this dimension would signal ongoing or recent licensing problems.
Disciplinary History (850 out of 850): This is a perfect score. It means that Verdica's review of Delaware state bar disciplinary records found no record of complaints, sanctions, suspensions, or public discipline against Lissette Crescimone. In regulatory terms, a perfect disciplinary score is the gold standard. It does not guarantee error-free work or client satisfaction—it means that no formal state bar action has been taken.
Practice Profile (700 out of 850): This sub-score is the lowest of the three and reflects data on how a provider's practice is structured, reported, or indexed in public records. A score of 700 sits at the boundary between "acceptable" and "strong" and suggests that some practice-related metrics are either incomplete, underreported, or differ from benchmarks Verdica tracks. This could reflect gaps in public practice disclosures, limited indexed practice history, or practice areas that generate less regulatory visibility. It is not a red flag, but it indicates less transparency or documentation than top-tier peers.
What regulators in DE track for legal providers
Delaware's bar disciplinary system, like other state bars, monitors attorney conduct through a formal complaint and investigation process. Regulators track violations including mishandling client funds, failure to communicate, unauthorized practice, ethical breaches, and dishonesty. The state bar publishes disciplinary records—opinions, suspensions, and disbarments—which Verdica indexes to flag high-risk providers.
Practice profile data includes information on licensing history, practice areas, institutional affiliations, and any publicly filed disclosures. States require attorneys to renew licenses and, in some cases, to report practice locations, specialties, and continued legal education. Regulators use this information to maintain an accurate registry and to flag gaps or inconsistencies that may indicate compliance gaps. A lower practice profile score may reflect incomplete public reporting, which could be resolved through updated disclosures.
Bottom line
Lissette Crescimone's 796 score places her in the strong compliance tier with clean disciplinary standing. Before engaging, a business owner should verify the specifics of her practice areas and experience align with your legal needs, and consider requesting references or case examples to fill the gap left by the absence of indexed customer reviews.