What Verdica's 796 score means for Marie Napoli
Marie Napoli's composite score of 796 out of 850 places her in the "strong" band (740–799). This score reflects a legal provider with solid standing and a clean disciplinary record, but with some room for improvement in practice profile metrics.
For a prospective client or referral source, a score in this range suggests a provider who meets professional standards reliably and has not faced significant regulatory action. The gap between 796 and the maximum of 850 indicates that while Napoli's core compliance posture is sound, there may be measurable differences in how her practice is structured, reported, or evaluated compared to top-tier performers. This is not a red flag—it is a normal variation among licensed legal professionals—but it does mean her profile is not in the "excellent" tier.
Readers should interpret this as: Marie Napoli is a low-risk choice from a regulatory and disciplinary standpoint, with credentials and history that do not raise compliance concerns. However, potential clients may want to conduct their own due diligence on specific practice areas, fee structures, or case outcomes, since the Verdica score reflects regulatory standing only, not client satisfaction, specialization, or value.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This sub-score reflects Napoli's current license status and standing with the Colorado bar. A score of 790 is strong and indicates active, current licensure without restrictions or limitations. Bar standing is typically the most straightforward metric—a licensed attorney in good standing scores high; an attorney with a suspended, inactive, or restricted license scores much lower. Napoli's score suggests no known bars to practice.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This is a perfect score, indicating no record of disciplinary action, complaints upheld, sanctions, or public reprimands in Verdica's indexed Colorado bar data. A perfect score here is significant: it means regulators have not found cause to take action against her. Conversely, scores in this category drop substantially when an attorney has ethics violations, malpractice findings, or regulatory sanctions on record. This perfect sub-score is Napoli's strongest indicator of compliance.
Practice Profile (700/850): This sub-score is the lowest of the three and likely reflects measurable gaps in how Napoli's practice is documented or reported. Practice profile metrics typically include factors such as the number of years in practice, scope of practice areas, size and structure of the practice, and adherence to continuing education and reporting requirements. A score of 700 is still in the acceptable range but suggests that compared to peers, Napoli may have a narrower practice footprint, newer registration, or less extensive practice history data available to regulators. This does not indicate misconduct—only that her practice profile is less extensive or developed than the top quartile.
What regulators in CO track for legal providers
The Colorado Supreme Court Office of Attorney Regulation maintains disciplinary records on all licensed attorneys. These records track ethics complaints, violations of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct, fee disputes, mishandling of client funds, conflicts of interest, and other professional misconduct. Public disciplinary records show warnings, suspensions, disbarments, and sanctions.
Practice history data includes admission date, practice jurisdictions, licensure status changes, and any restrictions or conditions on licensure. Some practice profile scoring also factors in participation in client protection funds, continuing legal education compliance, and practice entity registration details.
A score moves upward when an attorney maintains clean disciplinary records over time and maintains full, unrestricted licensure. It moves downward when complaints are filed, upheld, or result in sanctions—even minor ones—or when licensure is restricted, lapsed, or subjected to conditions.
Bottom line
Marie Napoli represents a strong compliance profile with a perfect disciplinary record and solid bar standing. Before engaging her services, prospective clients should verify her specific practice areas and experience align with their needs, since the regulatory score does not measure client outcomes or specialization.