What Verdica's 796 score means for Marisol Gomez-Decena
Marisol Gomez-Decena's composite score of 796 out of 850 places her in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating a legal provider with solid regulatory standing and minimal compliance red flags. This score reflects data pulled from Delaware's state bar disciplinary records and professional practice history—the primary indicators regulators use to assess attorney fitness and conduct.
A score in this range suggests that Gomez-Decena has maintained active bar standing, avoided serious disciplinary sanctions, and demonstrated consistent practice activity. For a business owner or consumer considering her services, this score signals lower compliance risk compared to providers in elevated or high-risk bands. However, it falls short of the "excellent" threshold (800–850), which typically indicates zero disciplinary history or other exceptional regulatory markers.
Readers should interpret this score as a baseline compliance checkpoint, not a comprehensive quality assessment. Verdica's scoring methodology focuses on regulatory data—what bar associations and state licensing bodies have on record. It does not yet reflect customer experience (no independent reviews are indexed for this provider) or detailed case outcomes, which would add important context for vetting a legal professional.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790): This sub-score reflects Gomez-Decena's current licensing status and any formal standing issues on record. A score of 790 is strong, indicating her license is active and in good regulatory standing. A much lower score in this dimension would signal suspension, probation, or administrative compliance problems that bar associations track as licensing prerequisites. Her near-maximum score here suggests no active licensing restrictions.
Disciplinary History (850): This is a perfect sub-score, the highest possible. It indicates that Verdica's review of Delaware state bar disciplinary records found no substantiated complaints, sanctions, or public disciplinary actions on file. In the legal profession, disciplinary history is heavily weighted because it reflects past conduct violations—ranging from minor ethics violations to client theft or fraud. A maximum score in this dimension is a significant compliance marker.
Practice Profile (700): At 700, this sub-score sits at the threshold of the "acceptable" band and is the lowest of the three dimensions. Practice profile typically reflects data on licensing longevity, practice scope, jurisdictional activity, and registration history. A score in this range suggests Gomez-Decena's practice records are compliant and verifiable, but may indicate limited tenure, narrower practice scope, or less extensive public history compared to providers scoring in the 750+ range on this metric. This is not a red flag—it simply captures a dimension where additional detail might help inform hiring decisions.
What regulators in DE track for legal providers
Delaware's state bar disciplinary system maintains records on attorney conduct, ethics violations, and professional responsibility. The bar tracks complaints involving misappropriation of client funds, failure to communicate, abandonment of cases, and violations of professional conduct rules. Licensing data includes bar admission date, jurisdictional authorizations, and any suspensions or reinstatement requirements.
Practice history records capture an attorney's registration status, area of practice, and compliance with continuing legal education (CLE) requirements. Regulators monitor whether attorneys maintain required insurance, keep client trust accounts properly segregated, and file annual compliance certifications.
Verdica's scoring methodology weighs these regulatory data types to flag providers with past violations or current standing issues. Scores move downward when disciplinary records show substantiated complaints, when bar standing becomes inactive or restricted, or when practice registration shows gaps or non-compliance. Conversely, clean disciplinary histories and active, consistent registration support higher scores.
Bottom line
Gomez-Decena's 796 score reflects a legal provider with strong regulatory compliance and no documented disciplinary history. Before engaging her services, you should verify her specific practice areas match your needs, confirm current contact and office information, and—given that no customer reviews are yet indexed—consider requesting references or reviewing any publicly available case information relevant to your matter.