What Verdica's 796 score means for Marisol Gomez-Decena
Marisol Gomez-Decena's composite score of 796 out of 850 places her in the "strong" performance band (740–799). This score reflects a legal provider with solid standing across the dimensions Verdica measures: bar licensure status, disciplinary history, and practice profile.
A score in this range indicates that a provider meets professional baseline requirements and shows no material red flags in regulatory records. For business owners or individuals considering engagement with this provider, a 796 score suggests reasonable confidence in baseline compliance and professional standing. However, it does not represent the highest tier of scoring; providers in the 800–850 band (excellent) demonstrate even stronger metrics across all dimensions.
The score is built on state bar disciplinary records and practice history—the public data sources that regulators maintain—so it reflects what is officially recorded, not subjective quality measures. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity, which means the score relies entirely on regulatory compliance data rather than client feedback.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 790 This sub-score reflects Marisol Gomez-Decena's current licensure and good standing status with the California bar. A score of 790 is strong but not perfect, indicating the provider is licensed and authorized to practice. Bar standing scores account for active licensure, any restrictions on practice, and membership compliance. A lower score in this dimension would typically signal probationary status, license suspension, or other regulatory constraints on practicing law.
Disciplinary History: 850 This is a perfect score and represents the strongest indicator in the profile. A score of 850 in disciplinary history means there are no recorded disciplinary actions, complaints, or sanctions in the state bar's public records. This dimension tracks actions taken by the California bar against providers—including reprimands, suspensions, restitution orders, or consent decrees. A clean record in this category is significant because it reflects no formal finding of misconduct by regulators.
Practice Profile: 700 This sub-score is the lowest of the three and sits in the acceptable range. Practice profile typically incorporates information about the scope, duration, and type of legal work the provider has publicly reported. A score of 700 suggests the practice history is documented and compliant but may indicate a narrower scope, shorter tenure, or less extensive public record compared to higher-scoring providers. This dimension does not reflect quality of work; rather, it reflects the depth and breadth of observable practice data.
What regulators in CA track for legal providers
California's State Bar maintains two primary public registries that feed into compliance scoring: disciplinary records and practice enrollment data. Disciplinary records document formal actions taken against attorneys, including ethical violations under the California Rules of Professional Conduct (spanning areas like client trust account mismanagement, misrepresentation, conflicts of interest, and failure to communicate). Practice history records capture when attorneys were admitted, their primary practice areas, and any restrictions on scope.
Verdica's scoring model weights these regulatory inputs to distinguish between providers with clean compliance records, those with minor or resolved issues, and those with material violations. A provider's disciplinary history is weighted heavily because it represents formal regulator findings, not allegations. Practice profile scoring reflects whether a provider's practice is well-documented and stable within state records, which serves as a proxy for transparency and regulatory engagement.
Scores move downward when disciplinary records show substantiated violations, when bar standing is restricted or probationary, or when practice history is sparse or unclear.
Bottom line
Marisol Gomez-Decena's 796 score reflects a provider with clean disciplinary standing and active licensure, though with a moderately documented practice profile. This is a strong baseline for regulatory compliance. Anyone considering engagement should independently verify their specific practice area aligns with your needs and request references or client examples, since no customer reviews are yet indexed.