What Verdica's 796 score means for Mark George Cunningham
Mark George Cunningham's composite score of 796 out of 850 places him in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating a legal provider with a solid compliance profile and professional standing. This score reflects data drawn from Oklahoma state bar records—specifically bar standing, disciplinary history, and documented practice profile.
A score in this range signals that a provider has maintained good standing with regulators and has not accumulated significant disciplinary flags. It does not mean perfection; providers in the strong band may have minor or resolved issues in their history, or practice profiles that show some variance across practice areas or client-facing metrics. What it does mean is that the underlying regulatory record does not present elevated risk factors that would warrant caution.
For a business owner, consumer, or organization considering legal services, a 796 score suggests Cunningham meets professional baselines and has demonstrated compliance with bar requirements over time. It is a reasonable indicator for initial vetting, though it should be paired with other due diligence—such as specific experience in your legal matter, fee alignment, and references—before engagement.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This sub-score reflects Cunningham's current licensing and regulatory status with the Oklahoma Bar Association. A score of 790 indicates active, good standing with the bar. Providers with lower bar standing scores may have licensing restrictions, probation, or inactive status. Cunningham's score in this dimension shows he has met continuing legal education requirements, membership dues, and other baseline regulatory obligations expected of practicing attorneys in Oklahoma.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This is a perfect score, indicating no substantiated disciplinary complaints or sanctions recorded in Oklahoma state bar disciplinary records indexed by Verdica. Attorneys with disciplinary history may have received warnings, reprimands, suspensions, or other formal actions for ethics violations, malpractice findings, or client complaints that were investigated and upheld by the bar. The absence of such records—reflected in this top score—is a material positive compliance indicator.
Practice Profile (700/850): This sub-score, at 700, is the lowest of the three and sits at the boundary between "acceptable" and "strong." Practice profile scoring typically reflects factors such as reported practice areas, client base, transaction volume, and any public records related to professional activities. A score of 700 suggests the practice profile data available is consistent with active legal practice, though it may indicate less extensive documentation, narrower specialization, or fewer indexed public indicators compared to providers scoring higher in this dimension. This does not reflect misconduct; it reflects the volume or breadth of practice-related data regulators or public records have captured.
What regulators in OK track for legal providers
Oklahoma's state bar maintains disciplinary records on all licensed attorneys, tracking complaints related to ethics violations (such as conflicts of interest, confidentiality breaches, or misappropriation of client funds), competence lapses, communication failures, and fee disputes. The bar investigates substantiated complaints and may issue private admonitions, public reprimands, suspensions, or disbarment depending on severity.
Verdica indexes these disciplinary outcomes to assess whether an attorney has faced formal sanctions. It also tracks bar standing status—whether a license is active, inactive, suspended, or revoked—and monitors continuing legal education (CLE) compliance and membership in good standing.
Practice history data includes publicly available information on an attorney's reported practice areas, years in practice, and documented professional activities. Regulators do not typically rate attorney competence or outcomes directly, but disciplinary records often reflect complaints about service quality or conduct that led to formal findings.
Bottom line
Cunningham's 796 score reflects strong regulatory standing with no disciplinary history and active bar membership. Before retaining his services, confirm he has relevant experience in your specific legal needs, verify current contact information and fee structures directly, and consider requesting references from prior clients in similar matters.