What Verdica's 838 score means for Matthew Harris
Matthew Harris has earned a composite score of 838 out of 850, placing him in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects a legal provider with no significant red flags in the areas Verdica measures: bar standing, disciplinary history, and practice profile.
For readers evaluating whether to work with this provider, a score in this range signals low regulatory risk based on available state bar data. The score does not measure quality of legal work, client outcomes, or expertise in any particular practice area—those require independent research or direct client references. What it does tell you is that Matthew Harris maintains active bar status in Texas with no public disciplinary record and a practice profile consistent with licensed legal practice. That baseline compliance matters, especially if you are vetting unfamiliar providers or conducting due diligence before engaging counsel.
The gap between his score (838) and a perfect score (850) is small but real. It reflects the Practice Profile sub-score of 790, which is notably lower than his perfect marks in the other two dimensions. This suggests some measurable difference between his practice footprint and modal profiles for legal providers in Texas—though without independent customer reviews or deeper practice data in Verdica's index, the specific driver of that gap cannot be determined from this report alone.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (850): A perfect score here means Matthew Harris holds an active, unrestricted license to practice law in Texas. This is a pass-fail dimension in regulatory terms. You either have a current, valid bar membership or you do not. A score of 850 confirms he does.
Disciplinary History (850): This perfect sub-score indicates no public record of formal complaints, sanctions, suspensions, or disbarments in the Texas state bar database. Again, this is a binary measure—either there is a disciplinary record or there is not. The absence of one is a baseline expectation for any licensed attorney; its presence would be a major warning signal.
Practice Profile (790): This sub-score is the most granular of the three. It evaluates the scope, consistency, and regulatory footprint of Matthew Harris's law practice as reflected in bar records and public filings. In the legal industry, this dimension typically captures factors such as practice tenure, areas of focus, bar registration status in multiple states, and alignment with standard practice patterns. A score of 790 is still well within the "strong" range, but it suggests his profile differs in some measurable way from the typical provider cohort in Texas—whether in scope of practice areas, years in practice, or geographic footprint. Without customer reviews or detailed practice data, the specific nature of that variation is not apparent from this scorecard.
What regulators in TX track for legal providers
The Texas State Bar maintains disciplinary records on all licensed attorneys, documenting complaints related to ethics violations, malpractice, fee disputes, unauthorized practice, and conduct unbecoming an attorney. These records are public and searchable. Verdica indexes this data to flag providers with open complaints, sanctions, suspensions, or disbarments.
The State Bar also maintains current licensing records that confirm active status, scope of license, and any restrictions. Verdica uses these to verify bar standing and infer practice profile characteristics—such as whether an attorney maintains licenses in multiple jurisdictions or holds certifications in specialized practice areas.
Factors that would lower a score include: disciplinary actions (even dismissed or minor ones), lapsed or inactive licensure, and practice profile anomalies that fall outside historical norms for Texas attorneys. Conversely, clean disciplinary records and consistent, documented practice history support high scores.
Bottom line
Matthew Harris presents as a low-risk provider based on regulatory data: active Texas bar status, clean disciplinary record, and a practice profile within acceptable parameters. Before engaging him, cross-check his specific expertise against your legal needs and, if possible, request references from prior clients—Verdica's score addresses compliance, not competence or fit.