What Verdica's 838 score means for Matthew Jones
Matthew Jones holds a composite Verdica score of 838 out of 850, placing him in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects strong standing across the dimensions Verdica tracks: bar registration status, disciplinary history, and practice profile. For someone evaluating a legal provider, a score in this range signals low regulatory risk based on publicly available state bar records.
The score does not mean the provider is perfect or has never faced challenges—it means that according to state bar data, there are no material red flags in his disciplinary record or licensing status. The 12-point gap from a perfect score likely reflects minor variations in the practice profile dimension rather than serious compliance issues. Readers should interpret this as: the regulatory baseline checks have cleared, and no disciplinary action or bar standing problems are documented in the underlying data.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing: 850 — This perfect sub-score indicates Matthew Jones holds an active, valid license to practice law in Texas with no suspension, revocation, or lapsed status on record. Bar standing is binary in nature; a license is either in good standing or it is not. A score of 850 here means no licensing problems are flagged by the state bar.
Disciplinary History: 850 — This also reflects a clean record. The Texas State Bar maintains a public disciplinary database. A perfect score in this dimension means no substantiated complaints, sanctions, or disciplinary actions appear in that record. This includes matters dismissed or resolved without finding of wrongdoing, as well as any formal discipline. A lower score would typically indicate prior complaints or sanctions that remain part of the public record.
Practice Profile: 790 — This sub-score is the lowest of the three, though still in the strong range. Practice profile typically captures indicators of professional activity, specialization, firm size, case type mix, or other structural elements derived from bar records or public filings. A score of 790 suggests a solid practice profile without material concerns, though perhaps with less extensive data or a less prominent footprint in the tracked dimensions than a perfect 850 would indicate. This does not imply misconduct; it may simply reflect a smaller practice scope or less-detailed public information available to the scoring algorithm.
What regulators in TX track for legal providers
The Texas State Bar disciplinary system is the primary regulator for attorney conduct in the state. Their records capture:
- Complaint history: Client complaints alleging violations of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, covering matters like neglect, dishonesty, conflict of interest, or fee disputes.
- Disciplinary outcomes: Formal actions including public reprimands, suspension, disbarment, or probation.
- Licensing status: Current eligibility to practice, active membership, or retired/inactive status.
Verdica draws from these public records to score bar standing and disciplinary history. The practice profile sub-score likely incorporates additional publicly available data on firm registration, practice areas, or activity level as reported to or filed with the state bar.
Scores move lower when disciplinary records exist, regardless of severity. A single substantiated complaint that resulted in a public reprimand would lower the disciplinary history score; multiple complaints or serious sanctions (suspension, disbarment) would lower it further. Bar standing drops immediately if a license is not active in good standing.
Bottom line
Matthew Jones presents a low-risk profile based on state bar records: active license, clean disciplinary history, and a solid practice profile. Anyone considering legal representation should still verify his specific expertise and experience match their needs, confirm current contact information, and discuss fee arrangements and case scope directly—Verdica's score addresses regulatory compliance, not service quality or fit.