What Verdica's 807 score means for Maury Cobb, Attorney at Law, LLC
Verdica's composite score of 807 out of 850 places Maury Cobb, Attorney at Law, LLC in the "excellent" band (800–850), indicating strong overall compliance standing based on regulatory records from the North Carolina state bar. This score reflects a provider with no significant disciplinary red flags and a solid practice profile.
For a business owner or consumer considering this firm, an 807 score signals that the attorney has maintained good standing with the state regulator and has not generated the kinds of complaints or violations that would trigger formal disciplinary action. The gap between this score and a perfect 850 is modest—39 points—which suggests areas of note in practice profile or bar standing history, but nothing that moves the provider into a lower risk category. This grade places the firm well above the threshold of concern and in the upper echelon of indexed legal providers.
How the sub-scores break down
Bar Standing (790/850): This sub-score reflects the attorney's current licensing status and compliance with bar admission and practice requirements in North Carolina. A score of 790 is very strong, though not perfect. It means the attorney is active and in good standing with the state bar. Minor deductions in this dimension might reflect administrative issues, late renewals, or similar non-disciplinary matters that do not prevent practice but are noted in regulatory records.
Disciplinary History (850/850): This is a perfect score, indicating no substantiated disciplinary complaints, violations, or sanctions on record with the North Carolina State Bar. In the legal industry, a clean disciplinary record is the baseline expectation, but not all providers meet it. A score of 850 here means there are no public findings of misconduct related to ethics violations, malpractice complaints upheld by the bar, trust account violations, or fraud allegations.
Practice Profile (755/850): This sub-score is the lowest of the three and reflects aspects of the attorney's practice history, credentials, experience breadth, or licensing specializations as recorded by the bar. A 755 is still in the "strong" range (740–799) and suggests a credible practice profile with areas that may be more limited or specialized. This could indicate a focused practice area, a shorter tenure, or limited information available in public bar records. It does not signal problems, but rather reflects the scope or depth of documented practice activity.
What regulators in NC track for legal providers
The North Carolina State Bar maintains disciplinary records that track attorney conduct against the state's rules of professional conduct. These rules cover areas such as conflicts of interest, competence, communication with clients, fee disputes, trust account management, and honesty in dealings with third parties. Infractions can range from minor violations (resulting in admonitions) to serious breaches (resulting in suspension or disbarment).
Verdica's underlying data also incorporates practice history—the active areas of law, licensing status, bar admission dates, and any public records of bar actions or complaints. Regulators track whether an attorney is in good standing, whether they maintain active licenses, and whether they have satisfied continuing legal education (CLE) requirements. While not all complaints are sustained or result in formal discipline, the presence of substantiated violations moves scores downward.
Scores improve with a clean disciplinary record, current bar admission, demonstrated practice activity, and no history of ethics complaints. Scores decline with suspended licenses, upheld disciplinary findings, fraud, mishandling of client funds, repeated ethics violations, or abandonment of clients.
Bottom line
Maury Cobb, Attorney at Law, LLC scores in the excellent band with no disciplinary history and strong bar standing. Someone considering this firm should verify that the attorney's practice area matches their legal need (given the Practice Profile score is the lowest of the three) and should cross-check references or case history before retaining.